<< All versions
Skill v1.0.0
currentAutomated scan100/100aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts/ml-model-explanation
──Details
PublishedOctober 1, 2026 at 12:21 AM
Content Hashsha256:ceadfaf8c342b614...
Git SHA3f5182cfd739
──Files
Files (1 file, 12.6 KB)
SKILL.md12.6 KBactive
SKILL.md · 344 lines · 12.6 KB
version: "1.0.0" name: ML Model Explanation description: Interpret machine learning models using SHAP, LIME, feature importance, partial dependence, and attention visualization for explainability
ML Model Explanation
Model explainability makes machine learning decisions transparent and interpretable, enabling trust, compliance, debugging, and actionable insights from predictions.
Explanation Techniques
- Feature Importance: Global feature contribution to predictions
- SHAP Values: Game theory-based feature attribution
- LIME: Local linear approximations for individual predictions
- Partial Dependence Plots: Feature relationship with predictions
- Attention Maps: Visualization of model focus areas
- Surrogate Models: Simpler interpretable approximations
Explainability Types
- Global: Overall model behavior and patterns
- Local: Explanation for individual predictions
- Feature-Level: Which features matter most
- Model-Level: How different components interact
Python Implementation
python
import numpy as npimport pandas as pdimport matplotlib.pyplot as pltimport seaborn as snsfrom sklearn.datasets import make_classificationfrom sklearn.model_selection import train_test_splitfrom sklearn.preprocessing import StandardScalerfrom sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier, GradientBoostingClassifierfrom sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegressionfrom sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier, plot_treefrom sklearn.inspection import partial_dependence, permutation_importanceimport warningswarnings.filterwarnings('ignore')print("=== 1. Feature Importance Analysis ===")# Create datasetX, y = make_classification(n_samples=1000, n_features=20, n_informative=10,n_redundant=5, random_state=42)feature_names = [f'Feature_{i}' for i in range(20)]X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42)# Train modelsrf_model = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42)rf_model.fit(X_train, y_train)gb_model = GradientBoostingClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42)gb_model.fit(X_train, y_train)# Feature importance methodsprint("\n=== Feature Importance Comparison ===")# 1. Impurity-based importance (default)impurity_importance = rf_model.feature_importances_# 2. Permutation importanceperm_importance = permutation_importance(rf_model, X_test, y_test, n_repeats=10, random_state=42)# Create comparison dataframeimportance_df = pd.DataFrame({'Feature': feature_names,'Impurity': impurity_importance,'Permutation': perm_importance.importances_mean}).sort_values('Impurity', ascending=False)print("\nTop 10 Most Important Features (by Impurity):")print(importance_df.head(10)[['Feature', 'Impurity']])# 2. SHAP-like Feature Attributionprint("\n=== SHAP-like Feature Attribution ===")class SimpleShapCalculator:def __init__(self, model, X_background):self.model = modelself.X_background = X_backgroundself.baseline = model.predict_proba(X_background.mean(axis=0).reshape(1, -1))[0]def predict_difference(self, X_sample):"""Get prediction difference from baseline"""pred = self.model.predict_proba(X_sample)[0]return pred - self.baselinedef calculate_shap_values(self, X_instance, n_iterations=100):"""Approximate SHAP values"""shap_values = np.zeros(X_instance.shape[1])n_features = X_instance.shape[1]for i in range(n_iterations):# Random feature subsetsubset_mask = np.random.random(n_features) > 0.5# With and without featureX_with = X_instance.copy()X_without = X_instance.copy()X_without[0, ~subset_mask] = self.X_background[0, ~subset_mask]# Marginal contributioncontribution = (self.predict_difference(X_with)[1] -self.predict_difference(X_without)[1])shap_values[~subset_mask] += contribution / n_iterationsreturn shap_valuesshap_calc = SimpleShapCalculator(rf_model, X_train)# Calculate SHAP values for a samplesample_idx = 0shap_vals = shap_calc.calculate_shap_values(X_test[sample_idx:sample_idx+1], n_iterations=50)print(f"\nSHAP Values for Sample {sample_idx}:")shap_df = pd.DataFrame({'Feature': feature_names,'SHAP_Value': shap_vals}).sort_values('SHAP_Value', key=abs, ascending=False)print(shap_df.head(10)[['Feature', 'SHAP_Value']])# 3. Partial Dependence Analysisprint("\n=== 3. Partial Dependence Analysis ===")# Calculate partial dependence for top featurestop_features = importance_df['Feature'].head(3).valuestop_feature_indices = [feature_names.index(f) for f in top_features]pd_data = {}for feature_idx in top_feature_indices:pd_result = partial_dependence(rf_model, X_test, [feature_idx])pd_data[feature_names[feature_idx]] = pd_resultprint(f"Partial dependence calculated for features: {list(pd_data.keys())}")# 4. LIME - Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanationsprint("\n=== 4. LIME (Local Surrogate Model) ===")class SimpleLIME:def __init__(self, model, X_train):self.model = modelself.X_train = X_trainself.scaler = StandardScaler()self.scaler.fit(X_train)def explain_instance(self, instance, n_samples=1000, n_features=10):"""Explain prediction using local linear model"""# Generate perturbed samplesscaled_instance = self.scaler.transform(instance.reshape(1, -1))perturbations = np.random.normal(scaled_instance, 0.3, (n_samples, instance.shape[0]))# Get predictionspredictions = self.model.predict_proba(perturbations)[:, 1]# Train local linear modeldistances = np.sum((perturbations - scaled_instance) ** 2, axis=1)weights = np.exp(-distances)# Linear regression weightslocal_model = LogisticRegression()local_model.fit(perturbations, predictions, sample_weight=weights)# Get feature importancefeature_weights = np.abs(local_model.coef_[0])top_indices = np.argsort(feature_weights)[-n_features:]return {'features': [feature_names[i] for i in top_indices],'weights': feature_weights[top_indices],'prediction': self.model.predict(instance.reshape(1, -1))[0]}lime = SimpleLIME(rf_model, X_train)lime_explanation = lime.explain_instance(X_test[0])print(f"\nLIME Explanation for Sample 0:")for feat, weight in zip(lime_explanation['features'], lime_explanation['weights']):print(f" {feat}: {weight:.4f}")# 5. Decision Tree Visualizationprint("\n=== 5. Decision Tree Interpretation ===")# Train small tree for visualizationsmall_tree = DecisionTreeClassifier(max_depth=3, random_state=42)small_tree.fit(X_train, y_train)print(f"Decision Tree (depth=3) trained")print(f"Tree accuracy: {small_tree.score(X_test, y_test):.4f}")# 6. Model-agnostic global explanationsprint("\n=== 6. Global Model Behavior ===")class GlobalExplainer:def __init__(self, model):self.model = modeldef get_prediction_distribution(self, X):"""Analyze prediction distribution"""predictions = self.model.predict_proba(X)return {'class_0_mean': predictions[:, 0].mean(),'class_1_mean': predictions[:, 1].mean(),'class_1_std': predictions[:, 1].std()}def feature_sensitivity(self, X, feature_idx, n_perturbations=10):"""Measure sensitivity to feature changes"""original_pred = self.model.predict_proba(X)[:, 1].mean()sensitivities = []for perturbation_level in np.linspace(0.1, 1.0, n_perturbations):X_perturbed = X.copy()X_perturbed[:, feature_idx] = np.random.normal(X[:, feature_idx].mean(),X[:, feature_idx].std() * perturbation_level,len(X))perturbed_pred = self.model.predict_proba(X_perturbed)[:, 1].mean()sensitivities.append(abs(perturbed_pred - original_pred))return np.array(sensitivities)explainer = GlobalExplainer(rf_model)pred_dist = explainer.get_prediction_distribution(X_test)print(f"\nPrediction Distribution:")print(f" Class 0 mean probability: {pred_dist['class_0_mean']:.4f}")print(f" Class 1 mean probability: {pred_dist['class_1_mean']:.4f}")# 7. Visualizationprint("\n=== 7. Explanability Visualizations ===")fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 3, figsize=(16, 10))# 1. Feature Importance Comparisontop_features_plot = importance_df.head(10)axes[0, 0].barh(top_features_plot['Feature'], top_features_plot['Impurity'], color='steelblue')axes[0, 0].set_xlabel('Importance Score')axes[0, 0].set_title('Feature Importance (Random Forest)')axes[0, 0].invert_yaxis()# 2. Permutation vs Impurity Importanceaxes[0, 1].scatter(importance_df['Impurity'], importance_df['Permutation'], alpha=0.6)axes[0, 1].set_xlabel('Impurity Importance')axes[0, 1].set_ylabel('Permutation Importance')axes[0, 1].set_title('Feature Importance Methods Comparison')axes[0, 1].grid(True, alpha=0.3)# 3. SHAP Valuesshap_sorted = shap_df.head(10).sort_values('SHAP_Value')colors = ['red' if x < 0 else 'green' for x in shap_sorted['SHAP_Value']]axes[0, 2].barh(shap_sorted['Feature'], shap_sorted['SHAP_Value'], color=colors)axes[0, 2].set_xlabel('SHAP Value')axes[0, 2].set_title('SHAP Values for Sample 0')axes[0, 2].axvline(x=0, color='black', linestyle='--', linewidth=0.8)# 4. Partial Dependencefeature_0_idx = top_feature_indices[0]feature_0_values = np.linspace(X_test[:, feature_0_idx].min(), X_test[:, feature_0_idx].max(), 50)predictions_pd = []for val in feature_0_values:X_temp = X_test.copy()X_temp[:, feature_0_idx] = valpred = rf_model.predict_proba(X_temp)[:, 1].mean()predictions_pd.append(pred)axes[1, 0].plot(feature_0_values, predictions_pd, linewidth=2, color='purple')axes[1, 0].set_xlabel(feature_names[feature_0_idx])axes[1, 0].set_ylabel('Average Prediction (Class 1)')axes[1, 0].set_title('Partial Dependence Plot')axes[1, 0].grid(True, alpha=0.3)# 5. Model Prediction Distributionpred_proba = rf_model.predict_proba(X_test)[:, 1]axes[1, 1].hist(pred_proba, bins=30, color='coral', edgecolor='black', alpha=0.7)axes[1, 1].set_xlabel('Predicted Probability (Class 1)')axes[1, 1].set_ylabel('Frequency')axes[1, 1].set_title('Prediction Distribution')axes[1, 1].grid(True, alpha=0.3, axis='y')# 6. Feature Sensitivity Analysissensitivities = []for feat_idx in range(min(5, X_test.shape[1])):sensitivity = explainer.feature_sensitivity(X_test, feat_idx, n_perturbations=5)sensitivities.append(sensitivity.mean())axes[1, 2].bar(range(min(5, X_test.shape[1])), sensitivities, color='lightgreen', edgecolor='black')axes[1, 2].set_xticks(range(min(5, X_test.shape[1])))axes[1, 2].set_xticklabels([f'F{i}' for i in range(min(5, X_test.shape[1]))])axes[1, 2].set_ylabel('Average Sensitivity')axes[1, 2].set_title('Feature Sensitivity to Perturbations')axes[1, 2].grid(True, alpha=0.3, axis='y')plt.tight_layout()plt.savefig('model_explainability.png', dpi=100, bbox_inches='tight')print("\nVisualization saved as 'model_explainability.png'")# 8. Summaryprint("\n=== Explainability Summary ===")print(f"Total Features Analyzed: {len(feature_names)}")print(f"Most Important Feature: {importance_df.iloc[0]['Feature']}")print(f"Importance Score: {importance_df.iloc[0]['Impurity']:.4f}")print(f"Model Accuracy: {rf_model.score(X_test, y_test):.4f}")print(f"Average Prediction Confidence: {pred_proba.mean():.4f}")print("\nML model explanation setup completed!")
Explanation Techniques Comparison
- Feature Importance: Fast, global, model-specific
- SHAP: Theoretically sound, game-theory based, computationally expensive
- LIME: Model-agnostic, local explanations, interpretable
- PDP: Shows feature relationships, can be misleading with correlations
- Attention: Works for neural networks, interpretable attention weights
Interpretability vs Accuracy Trade-off
- Linear models: Highly interpretable, lower accuracy
- Tree models: Interpretable, moderate accuracy
- Neural networks: High accuracy, less interpretable
- Ensemble models: High accuracy, need explanation techniques
Regulatory Compliance
- GDPR: Right to explanation for automated decisions
- Fair Lending: Explainability for credit decisions
- Insurance: Transparency in underwriting
- Healthcare: Medical decision explanation
Deliverables
- Feature importance rankings
- Local explanations for predictions
- Partial dependence plots
- Global behavior analysis
- Model interpretation report
- Explanation dashboard