version: "1.0.1" name: submit-ara description: | ARA Submitter. Takes a research directory, makes sure it is a valid Agent-Native Research Artifact (ARA) — compiling it with the compiler skill when it is not — guarantees it carries an interactive visualization (research-visualizer), then publishes it to the ARA Hub and hands back one link plus an update token. The token is stored in the artifact's own .ara_env, so the next submission of the same work REPLACES it in place instead of creating a second entry. Publishes through the user's GitHub account when they have one, and straight to the Hub when they do not — no account required either way.

TRIGGERS: submit, submit ara, publish ara, upload ara, share ara, push ara to github, add to ara hub, submit-ara, publish artifact, make my ara public, submit to a conference, update my submission, resubmit argument-hint: "[ara-dir] [--title <t>] [--hosted] [--github] [--new] [--no-viz] [--dry-run]" allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash(gh |git |python3 |curl |cat |ls |find |mkdir |cp |rm |test |basename |jq |open ) metadata: author: ara-commons category: research-tooling version: "2.0.0" tags: [research, publishing, ara-hub, conferences, visualization]

ARA Submitter

You take a research directory and get it published, viewable, and updatable: validate (or build) the ARA, guarantee it has a visualization, publish it, and hand back the link. You are a first-class agent — use your native tools directly, and invoke the compiler / research-visualizer skills when the steps below call for them.

What changed, and why it matters

A submission is not a one-shot event. The same artifact gets revised — a reviewer asks for another ablation, a number changes the night before a deadline — and the failure this skill exists to prevent is four near-identical entries on the Hub, none of them obviously the current one. So every submission writes an `.ara_env` into the artifact directory, and every later run reads it and updates the same artifact rather than creating a new one.

The other thing that changed: publishing no longer requires a GitHub account. A conference that accepts ARA as a submission format cannot ask its authors to be repo maintainers first. When the user has GitHub auth, GitHub stays the data layer and the Hub points at it; when they do not, the Hub stores the artifact itself. Both paths end at the same kind of Hub URL, and both are public on the Hub landing page. Say so before you upload, every time — an author who thought they were submitting privately has been badly served.

Set expectations FIRST

Before running any step, output the time notice — publishing is slow when it has to compile and/or visualize:

⏳ Publishing an ARA can take ~15 minutes. I may need to (1) compile your input into the ARA

format, (2) generate the interactive visualization (figure rendering can be slow), and (3)

upload it. The artifact will be publicly listed on the ARA Hub. I'll report progress at each

step — please keep this session open.

Then announce each step as you start it (▶ Step 3/5: …).

Arguments

• First positional path → the ARA directory (or raw research input). Default: the ARA most

recently referenced in context, else the single dir under ./ara-output/, else ask.

• --title <t> → artifact title. Default: PAPER.md's title.
• --hosted / --github → force a route instead of auto-detecting (Step 4).
• --new → submit as a separate artifact even though .ara_env exists. Rare; say why.
• --no-viz → skip visualization (only if the dir already has one).
• --dry-run → show what would be uploaded and stop.

Workflow (5 steps)

1. RESOLVE the input directory
2. VALIDATE it is an ARA   → if not, COMPILE with the `compiler` skill
3. VISUALIZE               → ensure trajectory.html, else run `research-visualizer`
4. ROUTE                   → update in place / GitHub / hosted
5. PUBLISH + REPORT        → one link, plus where the token went

Step 1 — Resolve the input

Resolve the argument to an absolute path and confirm it is a directory. Its name and location are irrelevant; only its structure matters (Step 2). You will never git init inside the user's working tree.

Step 2 — Validate it is an ARA (compile if not)

One observable test, identical to the visualizer's precondition: does the input expose a parseable trace/exploration_tree.yaml with ≥1 node, in a standard ARA layout (PAPER.md, logic/, src/, trace/, evidence/)?

• Complete ARA → Step 3.
• Not an ARA (a paper, a repo, run logs, notes) → invoke the `compiler` skill to produce

one under ./ara-output/<slug>/, then use that. Never hand-roll an ARA.

• Incomplete or stale → invoke the compiler skill to fill the same directory.

Run a light Seal Level 1 check (mandatory-core files present and non-empty, tree parses). If it still fails after one compiler pass, report the specific gaps and stop. Never publish a broken artifact.

Step 3 — Ensure the visualization

The Hub renders trajectory.html, and both publish paths refuse a bundle without one.

• Check <ara-dir>/trajectory.html.
• Missing (and not --no-viz) → invoke the research-visualizer skill, writing to

<ara-dir>/trajectory.html. This is usually the slowest step; say it is underway.

• Present → keep it; offer to regenerate only if Step 2 changed the ARA.

Step 4 — Route

Check three things, in this order, and take the first that applies.

1. `<ara-dir>/.ara_env` exists → this artifact has been submitted before. Update it in place.

Never create a second entry for work that already has one; that is the whole point of the file.

• It carries ARA_SLUG + ARA_TOKEN → hosted. Re-run the uploader (Step 5); it finds the

token itself.

• It carries ARA_GITHUB=<owner>/<repo> → GitHub-backed. Push the updated files to that repo

and re-register (Step 5, GitHub path).

1. `gh auth status` succeeds (and no --hosted) → the GitHub path. The user already has

the account, so their artifact should live in a repo they own and can cite.

1. Otherwise → the hosted path. No account, no auth, no prerequisites.

State which route you took and why in one sentence. If gh is missing or unauthenticated, that is not an error to report — it is the hosted path, silently taken.

Step 5 — Publish and report

Hosted path. One command; it bundles the directory, uploads it, writes .ara_env, and adds that file to the ARA's .gitignore:

python3 "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/submit.py" <ara-dir> --title "<title>"

Useful flags: --author (repeatable), --domain, --headline, --abstract, --steps, --dead-ends, --dry-run, --json. If ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR} is unset, use this skill's own directory, or the hosted mirror: curl -fsSL https://www.agenticresearch.sh/s/submit-ara.py | python3 - <ara-dir>. A re-run on the same directory updates it; the script prints the revision number.

GitHub path. Exact commands in ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/upload-and-hub.md §Publish. In summary: copy the ARA to a scratch dir, add a short README.md and a .gitignore (keeping trajectory.html, ignoring .ara_env), git init, then gh repo create <owner>/<slug> --public --source <stage> --remote origin --push. Then register it — POST /api/submit with the entry JSON — and verify the response is 2xx with ok:true before claiming it is on the Hub. Write ARA_GITHUB=<owner>/<repo> and ARA_URL=<hub url> into <ara-dir>/.ara_env so the next run updates instead of duplicating.

Final report, always:

• 🌐 Hub: the artifact URL (this is the link to share or put in a submission form)
• 🎞️ Full screen: the /raw/.../trajectory.html URL
• 🔑 Token: written to <ara-dir>/.ara_env, gitignored, unrecoverable if lost — and the one

thing that makes the next submission an update

• 📊 Stats: claims / experiments / tree nodes / evidence figures, and whether this run compiled,

visualized, created, or updated

Critical rules

1. Set the ~15-minute expectation and the public-listing fact up front — before any step.
2. Never publish a broken ARA — Step 2 must pass (after at most one compiler pass).
3. `.ara_env` decides identity. If it exists, you are updating. Creating a second artifact for

the same directory requires --new and an explicit reason said out loud.

1. Never commit the token. The uploader gitignores .ara_env; on the GitHub path you must not

stage it into the repo you push.

1. The token cannot be recovered. Say this when you print it. A lost .ara_env means a new

artifact and a dead link in whatever form the old one was pasted into.

1. Publish from a clean copy on the GitHub path — never git init in the user's working tree

or in ara-output/.

1. trajectory.html ships with the artifact — it is what the Hub renders; both paths reject a

bundle without it, and it is never gitignored.

1. Don't reinvent the builders — compiling belongs to compiler, visualizing to

research-visualizer. This skill orchestrates.

1. Verify before claiming success — the hosted upload must return 201/200, the GitHub path's

POST /api/submit must return 2xx with ok:true. If it failed, say the artifact is not on the Hub and give the retry command.

Reference files

Load on demand:

• ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/upload-and-hub.md — the hosted API contract (POST /api/ara,

PUT /api/ara/<slug>, the .ara_env format), the GitHub publish commands and slug derivation, the registry entry schema, and the Hub URL contract.