Skill v1.0.1

currentLLM-judged scan90/100

codewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit/modern-csharp

+3 new

──Details

PublishedAugust 15, 2026 at 07:48 PM

Content Hashsha256:bc23e927c4a72dab...

Git SHA23300897f4d1

Bump Typepatch

Compare with v1.0.0

──Files

Files (1 file, 6.8 KB)

SKILL.md6.8 KBactive

SKILL.md · 198 lines · 6.8 KB

version: "1.0.1" name: modern-csharp description: > Modern C# language features for .NET 10 and C# 14. Covers primary constructors, collection expressions, the field keyword, extension members, records, pattern matching, spans, and raw string literals. Load this skill when writing any new C# code, reviewing existing code for modernization, using "modern C#", "C# 14", "primary constructor", "collection expression", "records", "pattern matching", "span", "field keyword", or "extension members". Always loaded as the baseline for all agents.

Modern C# (C# 14 / .NET 10)

Core Principles

Use the newest stable features — C# 14 is the target. Prefer language-level constructs over library workarounds.
Readability over cleverness — Pattern matching and expression-bodied members improve readability when used appropriately; deeply nested patterns do not.
Value types where possible — Prefer record struct, Span<T>, and stack allocation to reduce GC pressure.
Immutability by default — Use record, readonly, init, and required to make illegal states unrepresentable.

Patterns

Well-Known Features Quick Reference

Feature	Usage	Example
Primary constructors	DI injection, eliminate field assignments	`public class OrderService(IOrderRepo repo, TimeProvider clock) { }`
Collection expressions	`[]` for all collection types + spread	`List<string> names = ["Alice", "Bob"];` / `int[] all = [..a, ..b, 99];`
Records	DTOs, value objects, immutable data	`public record CreateOrderRequest(string CustomerId, List<OrderItem> Items);`
`readonly record struct`	Small stack-allocated value types	`public readonly record struct Money(decimal Amount, string Currency);`
Pattern matching	Switch expressions, list/property patterns	`order switch { { Total: > 1000 } => "Premium", _ => "Standard" };`
List patterns	Deconstruct arrays/lists	`items switch { [] => "Empty", [var x] => $"One: {x}", [var f, .., var l] => $"{f}..{l}" };`
`Span<T>`	Zero-allocation slicing	`ReadOnlySpan<char> trimmed = input.Trim(); int.TryParse(trimmed[4..], out id);`
Raw string literals	Multi-line SQL, JSON, XML	`var sql = """ SELECT ... """;` / interpolated: `$$""" {"id": "{{id}}"} """;`
`required` members	Enforce initialization	`public required string ConnectionString { get; init; }`
`is` pattern + extraction	Null/type/property check	`if (result is { IsSuccess: true, Value: var order }) { ... }`

The `field` Keyword (C# 14)

Access the auto-generated backing field in property accessors without declaring it manually.

csharp

// GOOD — field keyword for validation in auto-property
public class Product
{
    public string Name
    {
        get => field;
        set => field = value?.Trim() ?? throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(value));
    }
 
    public decimal Price
    {
        get => field;
        set => field = value >= 0 ? value : throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(value));
    }
}

Lazy Initialization with `field`

csharp

public class ProductCatalog
{
    // Lazy-load on first access — no manual Lazy<T> or backing field
    public IReadOnlyList<Product> Products
    {
        get => field ??= LoadProducts();
    }
 
    private static List<Product> LoadProducts() => /* expensive load */;
}

Change Notification with `field`

csharp

// INotifyPropertyChanged without manual backing fields
public class OrderViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
{
    public event PropertyChangedEventHandler? PropertyChanged;
 
    public string CustomerName
    {
        get => field;
        set
        {
            if (field == value) return;
            field = value;
            PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(nameof(CustomerName)));
        }
    } = "";
 
    public decimal Total
    {
        get => field;
        set
        {
            if (field == value) return;
            field = value;
            PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(nameof(Total)));
        }
    }
}

Extension Members (C# 14)

C# 14 adds extension blocks inside static classes. Unlike classic extension methods, they support extension properties and static extension members — the receiver is declared once for the whole block.

csharp

// GOOD — extension block (shipped C# 14 syntax)
public static class OrderExtensions
{
    extension(Order order)
    {
        public decimal TotalWithTax => order.Total * 1.2m;
 
        public bool IsHighValue => order.Total > 1000m;
 
        public string ToSummary() =>
            $"Order #{order.Id}: {order.Total:C} ({order.Items.Count} items)";
    }
 
    // Static extension members use the type (no receiver instance)
    extension(Order)
    {
        public static Order Empty => Order.Create("none", [], DateTimeOffset.MinValue);
    }
}
 
// Callers see them as if declared on Order
if (order.IsHighValue) { /* ... */ }

Classic this-parameter extension methods still work and coexist — use extension blocks when you need properties or several members on the same receiver.

Anti-patterns

Don't Use Obsolete Patterns When Modern Alternatives Exist

csharp

// BAD — manual backing field when field keyword works
private string _name;
public string Name
{
    get => _name;
    set => _name = value ?? throw new ArgumentNullException();
}
 
// BAD — old-style collection initialization
var list = new List<int>() { 1, 2, 3 };
 
// BAD — Tuple instead of record for domain types
(string Name, decimal Price) product = ("Widget", 9.99m);
// GOOD — record
public record Product(string Name, decimal Price);

Don't Over-pattern-match

csharp

// BAD — deeply nested pattern that's hard to read
if (order is { Customer: { Address: { Country: { Code: "US" } } } })
 
// GOOD — extract to a clear method or use sequential checks
if (order.Customer.Address.Country.Code == "US")

Don't Use `var` When the Type Is Not Obvious

csharp

// BAD — what type is this?
var result = Process(order);
 
// GOOD — explicit type when not obvious
Result<Order> result = Process(order);
// Also GOOD — var is fine when type is apparent
var orders = new List<Order>();

Decision Guide

Scenario	Recommendation
DTO / API contract	`record` (reference type)
Small value object (2-3 fields)	`readonly record struct`
Service with DI	Primary constructor
Collection creation	Collection expression `[]`
Property with validation	`field` keyword
Multi-line string (SQL, JSON)	Raw string literal `"""`
Slicing strings/arrays	`Span<T>`
Type checking + extraction	Pattern matching with `is` / `switch`
Enforced initialization	`required` modifier
Adding methods to external types	Extension members

← v1.0.0 All versions

Skill v1.0.1

Modern C# (C# 14 / .NET 10)

Core Principles

Patterns

Well-Known Features Quick Reference

The field Keyword (C# 14)

Lazy Initialization with field

Change Notification with field

Extension Members (C# 14)

Anti-patterns

Don't Use Obsolete Patterns When Modern Alternatives Exist

Don't Over-pattern-match

Don't Use var When the Type Is Not Obvious

Decision Guide

The `field` Keyword (C# 14)

Lazy Initialization with `field`

Change Notification with `field`

Don't Use `var` When the Type Is Not Obvious