<< All versions

Skill v1.0.0

currentAutomated scan100/100
henriquecaner/hormozi-gtm/pricing-playbook
──Details
PublishedSeptember 27, 2026 at 10:42 AM
Content Hashsha256:f82bb920062eceb2...
Git SHA
──Files
Files (1 file, 5.0 KB)
SKILL.md5.0 KBactive
SKILL.md · 116 lines · 5.0 KB

version: "1.0.0" name: pricing-playbook description: The 5 laws of Hormozi's LEAKED Pricing Playbook. Use it to analyze the current price, recommend a range, structure tiers and anchoring, and validate against the Value Equation and the market.


Pricing Playbook — 5 Laws

Source: LEAKED Pricing Playbook + cross-referenced with $100M Offers.

Law 1: Don't compete on price. Compete on value.

Before touching price, run the Value Equation (skill value-equation). If Probability sits at 4/10, dropping the price won't help — strengthen probability first (case studies, guarantees, a named mechanism).

Violation signal: "They charge X, I'll charge X-20%."

Law 2: Charge what it's worth, not what it costs.

Cost is your problem, not the customer's. Cost-plus pricing (cost + margin) leaves money on the table.

Value-based pricing:

  • Measure the transformation delivered in dollars or time
  • Charge 10-20% of the transformation
  • Justify the price by the outcome, not the input

Example: if you help a client close an extra $100k in 60 days, charging $10-20k is defensible.

Law 3: Price signals quality.

A price that's too low = perception of low value.

Counterintuitively, high prices INCREASE:

  • Customer commitment (skin in the game)
  • Results (the customer actually applies it)
  • Margin for a high-quality delivery
  • Filtering out difficult customers

Rule of thumb: if more than 50% of leads say "done" without hesitating, your price is too low.

Law 4: Tiering captures more of the market without commoditizing.

3 standard tiers (silver / gold / platinum):

  • Silver: core without premium support, entry price
  • Gold (default): core + support + 1-2 bonuses (60-70% of customers pick it)
  • Platinum: core + done-for-you + 1:1 mentorship + premium bonuses (10-15% pick it, but high margin)

Rules:

  • The gap between tiers has to be perceived (not cosmetic)
  • Platinum exists to make Gold look cheap (anchoring)
  • Silver exists so you don't lose budget-conscious buyers
  • Default = Gold (visual highlight on the LP)

Tiering by product category

These are market reference points (B2B/B2C, 2024-2026) — localize per market and currency. A wider range is fine; what matters is the ratio between tiers (Gold ~3-4x Silver; Platinum ~3-5x Gold).

CategorySilverGold (default)Platinum (decoy)
Self-paced digital course$97$297$997
Live course (cohort)$297$1,497$4,997
Mastermind / group coaching$1,497$5,997$19,997
1:1 consulting (3 months)$4,997$11,997$29,997
B2B SaaS (monthly)$149/mo$499/mo$1,497/mo
B2B SaaS (annual, discounted)$1,428/yr$4,788/yr$14,388/yr
High-ticket service (3 months)$5,997$17,997$59,997 + continuity
Enterprise service (annual)—$60k$150k+

Platinum's decoy function:

Platinum doesn't need to sell volume — it exists so Gold looks like "the obvious choice." 10-15% pick Platinum (high margin); 60-70% pick Gold, anchored against Platinum. If Gold alone were $11,997 with no $29k anchor, conversion would drop 25-40%.

Signs of broken tiering:

  • Tiers too similar (Silver $297, Gold $397, Platinum $497) → false choice, nothing anchors
  • No Platinum → Gold looks like the ceiling, the customer haggles
  • No Silver → you lose budget-conscious buyers and gain nothing
  • The difference is only "more hours/sessions" → commoditization, the customer compares hour to hour

Law 5: Longer runway, bigger ask.

If you serve the customer for 12 months, you can charge far more than for a 1-month engagement — because the anchor is bigger and the cumulative transformation is bigger.

Application:

  • Long programs charge more per month (not less) than short ones
  • The annual-package anchor > the monthly-package anchor × 12
  • Genuine delayed gratification = a bigger ask

Pricing review workflow

  1. Gather: offer + current price + 3-5 competitors + target margin + LTV
  2. Run the Value Equation first (skill value-equation)
  3. Score each of the 5 laws with a grade and rationale
  4. Identify whether the problem is price or perception (critical distinction)
  5. Recommend a range (not a single price), with explicit anchoring
  6. Suggest a structure: tiers, installments, downsell, upsell
  7. Suggest a validation test (next 10-20 leads) executable in 1-2 weeks

Signs of broken pricing

  • Charging the same as a direct competitor (you're a commodity)
  • No tiers, no anchoring (leaving revenue on the table)
  • Price justified by hours/modules instead of transformation
  • More than 50% say "ok, done" without hesitating (underpriced)
  • More than 90% say "too expensive" and vanish (overpriced OR weak value equation)

Use by case

CaseApplication
Sales LPLP shows 3 tiers; Gold default highlighted; price anchored against ROI
Ad scriptPull price out of the initial ad (reveal it on the LP); use ROI in the copy
Business planPricing strategy per segment; projected tier mix; 70%+ margin guardrail

Detailed reference

See reference/leaked-pricing-playbook.md.

All versions