<< All versions
Skill v1.0.0
currentAutomated scan100/100henriquecaner/hormozi-gtm/template-positioning-map
──Details
PublishedSeptember 27, 2026 at 02:01 AM
Content Hashsha256:9f29d7dba519a706...
Git SHA9e09d531b514
──Files
Files (1 file, 5.2 KB)
SKILL.md5.2 KBactive
SKILL.md · 169 lines · 5.2 KB
version: "1.0.0" name: template-positioning-map description: "Internal output skeleton for the /hormozi-gtm:positioning command. Loaded by the command, not for direct use."
Template — positioning map
Canonical skeleton for the positioning map generated by /hormozi-gtm:positioning. The command loads this skill and fills the skeleton below with the user's inputs and the competitive analysis. Reproduce the exact structure: frontmatter + all sections + {{...}} placeholders. Internal output (competitive diagnostic) — raw voice, no humanizer.
markdown
---plugin: hormozi-gtmplugin_version: {{plugin_version}}command: positioningversion: 1status: draftcreated: {{ISO8601}}client: {{company_slug}}product: {{product_slug}}competitors_mapped: {{N}}frameworks:-value-equation-grand-slam-offer-pricing-playbook-niche-selectionhumanizer_pass: falsehumanizer_mode: n/avoice: rawlanguage: {{language}}audit_ref: {{path_or_null}}parent_version: {{prior_version_path_or_null}}---# Positioning Map — {{product_name}}## Positioning statement> "{{Exact line. For [specific ICP], [company] is the only one that [unique value] without [common trade-off].}}"**Single axis you defend:** {{1 line — e.g. "Implementation speed (5 days vs the market's 3-6 weeks)"}}**Backing:** {{1 line — real case or structural reason — e.g. "3 documented cases (Acme, Northwind, Globex) + a 4-session onboarding framework"}}---## 1. Competitive Map| Competitor | Stated positioning | Price | Primary ICP | Key message | Strength | Weakness ||---|---|---|---|---|---|---|| {{A}} | {{...}} | ${{...}} | {{...}} | "{{tagline}}" | {{...}} | {{...}} || {{B}} | {{...}} | ${{...}} | {{...}} | "{{tagline}}" | {{...}} | {{...}} || {{C}} (premium) | {{...}} | ${{...}} | {{...}} | "{{tagline}}" | {{...}} | {{...}} || {{D}} (cheap) | {{...}} | ${{...}} | {{...}} | "{{tagline}}" | {{...}} | {{...}} || Non-obvious substitute: {{e.g. "do it in-house"}} | n/a | ${{internal team cost}} | {{...}} | n/a | Control | Speed |---## 2. Your position| Dimension | You ||---|---|| Positioning | {{1 line}} || Price | ${{...}} || Primary ICP | {{specific}} || Key message | "{{tagline}}" |---## 3. Differentiation axes (defensible with facts)### Axis 1: {{e.g. Implementation speed}}**Market status:**-A: {{4-6 weeks}}-B: {{3-4 weeks}}-C: {{2-3 weeks}}-**You:** {{5 days}}**Backing:** {{Case story or structural reason. E.g. "3 documented cases (Acme, Northwind, Globex) where implementation took 5 days. Reason: a 4-session onboarding framework vs the 12 most use."}}**How to say it:** {{Punchy line for hero copy. E.g. "Live in 5 days, not 5 weeks."}}---### Axis 2: {{e.g. Niche specificity}}**Market status:**-A: {{serves general B2B SaaS}}-B: {{serves any B2B}}-**You:** {{B2B fintech SaaS with a > 60-day cycle}}**Backing:** {{12 of the last 14 clients are B2B fintech SaaS. Native founder-market fit.}}**How to say it:** {{"The only framework built specifically for B2B fintech with a > 60-day cycle."}}---### Axis 3: {{e.g. Conditional guarantee}}**Market status:**-A: "satisfaction or money back" guarantee (generic)-B: no guarantee-C: guarantee limited to 14 days**You:** "90 days with cycle cut by 40%, or we refund your investment + a $10k bonus."**Backing:** {{The only player in the niche offering a conditional guarantee with a payout above the refund.}}**How to say it:** {{"The only consultancy that pays you if it doesn't work."}}---## 4. Explicit trade-offsA defensible position has to say **what you are not**. The client knows they picked the right trade-off:-**You are NOT:** {{e.g. "a broad growth consultancy — we don't serve B2C, e-commerce, or B2C SaaS"}}-**You do NOT promise:** {{e.g. "cultural transformation — we focus on operational sales metrics"}}-**Who should pick someone else:** {{e.g. "pre-PMF founders with no sales data; clients who need M&A"}}---## 5. Copy derivatives### Hero copy (LP) — 3 variations**Variation 1 (speed focus):**> "{{punchy line, 6-10 words}}"> "{{sub-line, 15-25 words, with proof}}"**Variation 2 (specificity focus):**> "{{punchy line}}"> "{{sub-line}}"**Variation 3 (guarantee focus):**> "{{punchy line}}"> "{{sub-line}}"### Cold email subject — 3 variations1."{{specific subject, ≤ 50 chars}}"2."{{subject 2}}"3."{{subject 3}}"### LinkedIn bio (1)> "{{1-3 lines. Direct tone. Includes ICP + unique value + proof}}"### Sales-call opening line> "{{2-3 sentences. Not 'let me introduce myself'. Something that establishes authority + opens a curiosity gap in the first 30s of the call.}}"---## 6. Test planHow to validate that the positioning works:**Week 1-2:** ad with 3 hero-copy variations ($200 each). Measure CTR.**Week 3:** the winner becomes the LP headline. Measure LP conversion.**Week 4-5:** the winner becomes the cold-email subject. Measure reply rate.**Criterion:** positioning is considered validated if CTR and reply rate rise ≥ 25% vs the prior baseline.---*Positioning map generated by the hormozi-gtm plugin. Alex Hormozi persona applied. Raw voice — an internal competitive diagnostic does not go through the humanizer.*