<< All versions
Skill v1.0.0
currentAutomated scan100/100henriquecaner/hormozi-gtm/template-pricing-review
──Details
PublishedSeptember 27, 2026 at 12:06 PM
Content Hashsha256:2e554e54bd2d5694...
Git SHA9e09d531b514
──Files
Files (1 file, 4.6 KB)
SKILL.md4.6 KBactive
SKILL.md · 178 lines · 4.6 KB
version: "1.0.0" name: template-pricing-review description: "Internal output skeleton for the /hormozi-gtm:pricing command. Loaded by the command, not for direct use."
Template — pricing-review.md
Canonical output skeleton for the /hormozi-gtm:pricing command. The command loads this skill and fills the skeleton below with the analysis. Reproduce the exact structure: frontmatter + every section + {{...}} placeholders.
markdown
---plugin: hormozi-gtmplugin_version: {{plugin_version}}command: pricingversion: 1status: draftcreated: {{ISO8601}}client: {{company_slug}}product: {{product_slug}}frameworks:-pricing-playbook-value-equation-ltv-cac-money-modelshumanizer_pass: falsehumanizer_mode: n/avoice: rawlanguage: {{language}}audit_ref: {{path_or_null}}parent_version: {{prior_version_path_or_null}}---# Pricing Review — {{product}}## TL;DR**Current price:** ${{X}}**Recommendation:** range ${{Y}} to ${{Z}} (default Gold tier)**Biggest lever:** {{...}}**Main risk:** {{...}}---## 📊 Snapshot| Field | Value ||---|---|| Product | {{name}} || Current price | ${{X}} || Model | one-time \| recurring \| hybrid || Current gross margin | {{X}}% || Monthly volume | {{N}} customers || Estimated LTGP | ${{X}} || Current CAC | ${{X}} || LTGP:CAC ratio | {{X}}:1 |---## 🏛 Direct competition| Competitor | Similar offer | Price | Note ||---|---|---|---|| {{name 1}} | {{...}} | ${{X}} | {{...}} || {{name 2}} | {{...}} | ${{X}} | {{...}} || {{name 3}} | {{...}} | ${{X}} | {{...}} || {{name 4}} (upper anchor) | {{...}} | ${{X}} | {{...}} |**Your position in the market:** {{low | mid | mid-high | premium}}---## ⚖️ The 5 Laws analysis### Law 1: Compete on value, not on price**Score:** {{green | yellow | red}}**Diagnosis:** {{...}}**Recommendation:** {{...}}### Law 2: Charge what it's worth, not what it costs**Score:** {{...}}**Diagnosis:** {{...}}**Recommendation:** {{...}}### Law 3: Price signals quality**Score:** {{...}}**Diagnosis:** {{...}}**Recommendation:** {{...}}### Law 4: Tiering captures more of the market**Score:** {{...}}**Diagnosis:** {{do tiers exist? do they work?}}**Recommendation:** {{...}}### Law 5: Longer runway, bigger ask**Score:** {{...}}**Diagnosis:** {{...}}**Recommendation:** {{...}}---## 💡 Is it a price problem OR a perception problem?{{Specific analysis separating the two. If the problem is value perception, dropping the price doesn't fix it — strengthen probability first.}}**Conclusion:** {{it's a price problem | it's a perception problem | both}}---## 🎯 Recommendation### Proposed tier structure**Tier 1 — Silver: ${{X}}**-{{deliverables}}-{{For whom: entry/budget-conscious}}**Tier 2 — Gold (DEFAULT): ${{Y}}** ← highlight visually-{{deliverables}}-{{For whom: the bulk of the market, 60-70%}}**Tier 3 — Platinum: ${{Z}}**-{{deliverables}}-{{For whom: high-touch, anchoring}}### Anchoring{{How to present it visually: "vs Mentorship C at $X" or "stack value of $Y"}}### Payment structure-Paid in full: ${{X}}-{{N}} installments, no interest: ${{X/N}}-{{12}} installments with interest: ${{X/12 + interest}}### Downsell{{For whoever said no to Silver — format + price}}### Upsell (post-checkout){{Order bump or OTO — format + price + role in absorbing CAC within 30 days}}---## 🧪 Validation test (1-2 weeks)**Scenario:**The next 10-20 leads will get the new pricing.**Metrics:**-Conversion rate lead → close-AOV (average order value)-Take rate per tier (which one they pick)-Average time to decide-Reasons for "no" (qualitative interview with 3-5 no-buys)**Success criteria:**Conversion rate drops <30% AND AOV rises >50% → keep the new priceConversion rate drops >30% AND AOV rises <50% → revert or adjust---## ⚠️ Risks of the recommendation1.**{{Risk 1 — e.g.: "Offer audit shows weak Probability (4/10). Raising price without strengthening probability first can break conversion."}}**2.**{{Risk 2 — e.g.: "Competitor Y is running a promo until MM/DD. The timing can muddy the test."}}**3.**{{Risk 3 — e.g.: "No visible case studies on the LP, so the Platinum anchor may look artificial."}}**---## 🔄 Next steps1.If there's a prior audit AND Probability ≥ 7, roll out the new pricing in 2-3 days2.If Probability < 7, run `/hormozi-gtm:audit` first and strengthen the offer before touching the price3.After the 2-week test, revisit with `/hormozi-gtm:pricing` (versioning generates v2)---*Pricing review generated by the hormozi-gtm plugin. Alex Hormozi persona applied. Raw voice, no humanizer (internal/diagnostic output).*