Skill v1.0.3

version: "1.0.3" name: context-item-creation description: Guides you through creating context items — instructions, skills, knowledge pointers, and memory events — that give the AI analyst persistent knowledge about your organization. Covers when to create each type, naming conventions, folder organization, and the hard boundary between context (rules and procedures) and the semantic layer (logic and calculations).

Prerequisites

Before creating context items, ensure you are on the correct workspace and branch. Use get_session_workspace_and_branch to check the current session context. For development work, create a branch with create_workspace_branch (the session switches automatically). See the workspace-branch skill for the full workspace/branch tool reference.

Overview

Context items are the mechanism for giving the AI analyst persistent, organizational knowledge: standing rules it must always follow, on-demand procedures it can retrieve, external references it can look up, and a historical record of notable events.

Context items belong to the context layer — they are consumed by the Honeydew AI analyst at query time to shape its behavior. They are separate from the semantic layer (entities, metrics, attributes, relations, domains), which defines your data model and business logic such as metric calculations.

There are four types:

Before creating anything, read the critical boundary section below. Most requests for context items are actually requests to define or document logic — which belongs in the semantic layer, not in context.

THE HARD BOUNDARY: Context vs. Semantic Layer

This is the most important rule in this skill. Re-read it every time you are asked to create a context item.

Context items are for rules, procedures, and history. They are NOT for logic, calculations, or data definitions.

If the information describes how to compute something, what a value means mathematically, or how data is structured — it belongs in the semantic layer (as a metric, attribute, filter, relationship, or entity definition), not in a context item.

When to use the Semantic Layer instead

What context items ARE good for

• Instructions: A standing preference that refers to existing semantic objects, not logic. "Always use orders.net_revenue rather than orders.gross_revenue for revenue questions."
• Skills: A multi-step analytical procedure: "To investigate churn, start by segmenting cohorts, then compare retention curves, then identify the inflection point."
• Knowledge: A pointer to external policy documents, runbooks, or reference material.
• Memory/Events: "On 2024-03-01 we redefined revenue to exclude refunds — historical data was backfilled."

The test: Can you express this as a SQL expression or a schema definition? If yes, it belongs in the semantic layer. Context items should reference semantic objects by name, not define or duplicate their logic.

Before creating: where does this context belong?

Context items are only one of three places organizational context reaches the AI analyst. Before drafting an item, check whether the fact belongs in one of the other two — both are already part of every relevant session automatically, with no glob configuration.

Routing examples:

• "The `orders.status` codes mean: 'A' = active, 'L' = legacy (pre-2022 migration, treat as active), 'X' = test record." → field description (non-SQL facts about allowed values). If the rule were "active means status in ('A','L')", that's logic → make it a calculated attribute, not a description.
• "Users call refunds 'returns' — recognize both terms." → entity AI-metadata synonyms, not an instruction.
• "This agent only handles finance; revenue / margin / cogs questions route here." → agent description + body, not a **-globbed instruction.
• "For every revenue question, prefer `orders.net_revenue` over `orders.gross_revenue`." → instruction (cross-cutting, references existing semantic objects).
• "To investigate churn, segment by cohort then compare retention curves." → skill (on-demand playbook).

The test: is this fact about one semantic object, one agent, or the organization more broadly? Only the third belongs in a context item. The first two are already loaded into AI context via the semantic-object or agent definition — putting them in a context item duplicates and risks drift.

Before creating: extend or create?

Default to extending an existing item rather than creating a sibling, whenever the new fact describes the same domain concept as an existing item.

The most important "extend, don't create" target is often not a sibling context item — it's the field/entity description or the agent body (see "where does this context belong?" above). Check those first. The check below applies once you've confirmed the fact is genuinely cross-cutting and belongs in a context item at all.

The check, before drafting anything:

1. Run list_context_items and scan items whose folder or name touches the new fact's domain.
2. For each candidate, ask: does this item describe the same domain concept? — e.g. the data window, a metric's definition, a policy area, a deletion rule. Different sub-aspects of one concept (start vs end of a window; multiple reasons to exclude rows on the same field; sequential refinements of the same metric) are one concept.
3. If a candidate exists → call get_context_item, then update_context_item extending it. Broaden the title and description to reflect the new scope; keep the existing name to avoid breaking agent globs that reference it.
4. Only create a new item when no existing item covers the concept — or when the new fact is genuinely orthogonal (a different policy on the same entity, not a refinement of an existing one).

Smell test for "this should have been an update": two items in the same folder whose descriptions could be merged into a single coherent paragraph without losing information. Memory events especially are prone to this — a "launch" event and a "sunset" event for the same dataset are bookends of one window, not two independent facts. One memory event with both from_date and to_date is correct; two events split by sub-aspect is the smell.

Why this matters: each on-demand item is an independent retrieval candidate. Splitting one fact into N items means the model has to retrieve all N to reconstruct the concept, and any one being missed produces a partial-truth answer. One coherent item retrieves once and answers fully.

MCP Tools

create_context_item

Call create_context_item with the frontmatter fields as context_item parameters and the prose body as markdown_text.

After Creation/Update: Display the UI Link

After a successful create_context_item or update_context_item call, the response includes a ui_url field. Always display this URL to the user so they can quickly open the item in the Honeydew application.

update_context_item

To modify an existing context item:

1. Call get_context_item with the item's name to read its current content.
2. Call update_context_item with the item's name and the updated context_item fields and markdown_text.

Minimal diff rule: Only change the fields you need to modify. Context items are versioned in git, so unnecessary reformatting creates noisy diffs.

delete_context_item

Call delete_context_item with the item's name.

Naming and Organization

Name format

Names use folder/item-name with lowercase kebab-case and / as a hierarchy separator:

finance/use-net-revenue
customer/churn-analysis-playbook
confluence/data-governance-policy
finance/revenue-redefinition-2024

A flat name (no folder) is fine when the item is genuinely cross-cutting:

root-cause-analysis
gdpr-compliance-rollout

Why folders matter — agent scoping

When configuring an AI agent, context items are referenced using glob patterns. Folders let you include a coherent group of items with a single pattern:

• finance/* — all finance-specific rules and skills
• customer/* — all customer analysis guidelines
• */churn-* — all churn-related items regardless of team folder
• menu/** — all items under menu/ including subfolders (e.g. menu/drinks/latte-art)
• ** — all context items across all folders and subfolders (use sparingly; typically for a catch-all agent)

Organize by the team or domain that owns the context, not by the item type. Items of different types (instruction + skill + knowledge) for the same domain belong in the same folder:

finance/use-net-revenue         ← instruction
finance/variance-analysis       ← skill
finance/accounting-policy       ← knowledge
finance/revenue-redefinition    ← memory

This way, an agent configured with finance/* automatically gets all finance context.

Naming best practices

• Use the folder to reflect ownership, not to repeat the item type. finance/use-net-revenue is good. instructions/use-net-revenue is redundant.
• Name after the concept or rule, not the implementation. exclude-canceled-orders is better than filter-status-not-canceled.
• For memory events, name after the event itself, not a generic label. revenue-redefinition or gdpr-rollout beats data-change-3.
• For facts that may evolve, prefer concept-scoped names over event-scoped names. A memory item named data/launch-may-2023 locks the scope to the launch event; when the dataset later acquires a cutoff date, the narrow name tempts you into a sibling item rather than extending. data/data-window or data/data-coverage stays accurate as the facts grow. Same principle for instructions: bookings/revenue-definition survives a redefinition; an implementation-pinned name like bookings/use-confirmed-revenue-v2 does not.

Frontmatter format

Context items are stored as frontmatter documents: a YAML block between --- delimiters, followed by a markdown prose body. When calling create_context_item, pass the YAML fields as context_item parameters and the prose body as the markdown_text parameter.

The description field is the retrieval signal — the model reads it to decide whether to fetch an on-demand item. It is used for skills, knowledge, and memory events. Do not add description to instructions; their only content is the prose body.

See examples.md for what the full frontmatter documents look like.

Type Reference

Instruction — standing rule (always on)

Use when: There is a standing preference, constraint, or fact that the model must respect in every conversation. These are injected into every prompt automatically.

Keep instructions concise. They are never filtered out, so verbose instructions bloat every prompt. If the content is more than a short paragraph, turn it into a skill instead.

Parameters:

• type: instruction
• subtype: instruction
• name: folder/rule-name
• title: short human label
• prose body: the rule text — what the model must do or avoid
• related_objects: (optional) only the fields or entities directly named or constrained by this instruction — not downstream consumers, not lineage, not entities that happen to join to a relevant one; use an entity reference instead of a field list when the instruction applies to most fields of that entity
• labels: optional tags for grouping
• owner: (optional) defaults to the caller; only set if a different team or person should be listed

Good instruction topics:

• Metric selection preferences ("always use net_revenue")
• Domain-specific constraints ("exclude test accounts from all analyses")
• Terminology corrections ("what users call 'bookings' maps to the orders.gmv metric")

Skill — on-demand playbook

Use when: There is a multi-step analysis procedure the model should follow when asked about a specific topic. Skills are retrieved when the model judges them relevant based on the description.

Write a rich, keyword-dense `description` — this is what the model reads to decide whether to retrieve the skill. A weak description means the skill will be missed.

Parameters:

• type: instruction
• subtype: skill
• name: topic-or-folder/topic
• title: short human label
• description: required — precise, keyword-rich description of when to use this skill and what it covers (this is the retrieval signal)
• prose body: the playbook — step-by-step guide written in markdown (goes after the closing ---)
• labels: optional tags for grouping
• owner: (optional) defaults to the caller

Good skill topics:

• Root cause analysis procedures
• Customer cohort or churn investigation workflows
• Reporting preparation checklists
• Domain-specific investigation playbooks

Author the skill body with deep analysis

For analytical playbooks, generate the body with deep analysis (initiate_analysis + monitor_analysis; see the query skill) and wrap the result as a context item — the default for any subtype: skill item. Author directly only for non-analytical checklists the engine never runs against data.

The same engine will consume the skill, so a playbook it writes is grounded in the constructs it actually executes (entities, metrics, attributes, analysis moves) and it follows the result consistently — where it follows a hand-written one unevenly.

Workflow:

1. Set session context — a workspace/branch (see Prerequisites) and an agent (list_agents) whose domain matches the topic.
2. Prompt by goal, not by procedure. The builder is an AI with full schema access and its own skills for interpreting and planning analysis — over-specifying steps or particular semantic objects can suppress those skills and derail it. Give it goal-oriented instructions and only context it can't derive:

• Goal — what to make repeatable.
• External business context — definitions, policies, and requirements not in the schema.
• Prior investigation — analysis to run first so the playbook is grounded in data, with sampling caps (e.g. one recent day, one segment) to keep large facts cheap.
• Output — one self-contained, generalized markdown workflow that doesn't reference the values, dates, or segments sampled while building it.

Prescribe specific steps, scenarios, or semantic objects only when the user explicitly asked for them.

1. Poll to `DONE`, take the markdown from responses, strip any leftover sampled specifics, add frontmatter, and create_context_item.

Knowledge — external source pointer

Use when: There is an external document (Confluence page, Notion database, runbook, policy) that the model should consult when answering relevant questions. The model fetches the content via an MCP server at retrieval time.

Write a precise `description` that includes the topics the document covers — this is the retrieval signal.

Parameters:

• type: instruction
• subtype: knowledge
• name: source-folder/document-name
• title: short human label
• description: required — what topics this document covers (used for retrieval)
• external_source.tool: the MCP server name (e.g. confluence, notion)
• external_source.resource_id: the URI within that server (e.g. confluence://Page-Title)
• prose body: typically omit — the content is fetched from the external source at runtime
• labels: optional tags for grouping
• owner: (optional) defaults to the caller

Memory / Event — historical record

Use when: Something happened that affects how data should be interpreted: a metric was redefined, a process changed, a data migration occurred, a business event shifted baseline numbers.

Memory items are retrieved on demand when the model judges them relevant to the current question.

Parameters:

• type: memory
• subtype: event
• name: domain/event-name
• title: short human label
• description: required — what this event is about (used for retrieval)
• prose body: what happened and why it matters for data interpretation
• from_date: when the event occurred (point-in-time) or when it started (if a duration)
• to_date: (optional) end date for events spanning a period. Use the `from_date` / `to_date` bookend pattern for windows — a dataset's data-coverage window, a feature's availability period, an experiment's run dates. Set both bounds on a single item; do not split a window into two "start" and "end" events.
• related_objects: (optional) only the fields or entities directly changed or affected by this event — not downstream consumers, not lineage, not entities that happen to join to a relevant one; use an entity reference instead of a field list when the event affects most fields of that entity
• labels: optional tags for grouping
• owner: (optional) defaults to the caller

Good memory topics:

• Metric or definition changes with a specific effective date
• ETL migrations or data backfills
• Significant business events (acquisitions, product launches) that cause discontinuities in data
• Changes in how data is collected or tagged

Examples

See examples.md for full worked examples of each type, plus right-vs-wrong comparisons.

Discovery Helpers

• list_context_items — see all existing items (avoid duplicates)
• get_context_item — read a specific item's current content before updating
• list_agents / get_agent — see which agents reference which context globs, to understand the scoping impact of adding a new item

Documentation Lookup

Use the search_docs and query_docs_filesystem tools from the honeydew MCP server to search the Honeydew documentation when:

• You need to understand how context items interact with agents or how retrieval works
• The user asks about agent configuration, glob patterns, or context scoping
• You need guidance on memory subtypes or advanced context item options

Search for topics like: "context items", "instructions", "agent context", "memory events", "skills".

Best Practices

1. Semantic layer first. If the request is about logic, calculations, definitions, or data structure — build it in the semantic layer. Context items reference semantic objects; they do not replace them.

1. Instructions must be short. They're injected into every prompt. If it doesn't fit in 2–3 sentences, turn it into a skill.

1. Skill descriptions are the retrieval key. Write rich, specific, keyword-heavy descriptions. "Guide for root cause analysis of revenue drops, covering cohort isolation, period-over-period comparison, and funnel decomposition" is far better than "revenue analysis".

1. Folder by domain, not by type. finance/ should contain instructions, skills, knowledge, and events all related to finance. This makes agent glob patterns meaningful.

1. Check for adjacent items, not just duplicates, before creating. Run list_context_items first. Overlapping or contradictory instructions are worse than none — but adjacency matters as much as overlap. If an existing item describes the same domain concept (the data window, a metric's definition, a policy area), extend it rather than create a sibling. See "Before creating: extend or create?" above.

1. Use labels for cross-cutting concerns. Labels like pii, finance, or deprecated enable filtering that cuts across folder hierarchy.

MANDATORY: Confirm This Belongs in a Context Item

Before creating any context item, verify:

1. Does this describe a calculation or data definition? → Build it as a metric, attribute, or filter instead.
2. Is this a fact about one field or entity (its meaning, allowed values, synonyms)? → Update that field's or entity's description / AI metadata — already loaded into every relevant session, no glob needed.
3. Is this a fact about what an agent covers or how it speaks (scope, user-perspective phrasing, agent-wide rules)? → Update the agent's description + markdown body — already loaded into every session of that agent.
4. Is this a cross-cutting preference, playbook, external pointer, or historical event that references existing semantic objects by name? → Good candidate for a context item.

If you are unsure, ask the user: "Should this live on the field/entity, on the agent, or as a separate context item?"