Skill v1.0.1
currentAutomated scan100/100+3 new
version: "1.0.1" name: sprint description: Sprint workflow pipeline — chains plan → build → test → review → ship skills into a structured sprint. Use when starting a new feature or project iteration to follow the full lifecycle. argument-hint: "<feature-description>"
Sprint Workflow Pipeline
A sprint is the full lifecycle of shipping a feature — from planning through deployment. This skill chains Ultraship skills into a structured pipeline where each phase produces artifacts that feed the next.
Announce at start: "I'm using the sprint workflow to guide this feature from plan to ship."
The Pipeline
┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐│ PLAN │───▶│ BUILD │───▶│ TEST │───▶│ REVIEW │───▶│ SHIP │───▶│ VERIFY ││ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ ││ /write- │ │ /execute-│ │ /tdd │ │ /review │ │ /deploy │ │ /canary ││ plan │ │ plan │ │ │ │ │ │ /ship │ │ /retro │└──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘│ │ │ │ │ │▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼Plan doc Working code Tests pass Issues fixed Deployed Verified
Phase 1: Plan
Trigger: User describes a feature, requirement, or bug to fix.
- If the scope is large, use `ultraship:brainstorming` first to explore the idea space
- Use `ultraship:writing-plans` to create an implementation plan
- Plan is saved to
docs/ultraship/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature>.md
Artifacts produced: Implementation plan with file map, task list, test strategy
Gate: Plan must be reviewed and approved by user before proceeding to Build.
Phase 2: Build
Trigger: Plan is approved.
- Use `ultraship:executing-plans` to implement the plan task by task
- If tasks are independent, use `ultraship:dispatching-parallel-agents` for parallel execution
- If working in isolation, use `ultraship:using-git-worktrees` for a clean workspace
Scaling to large work: Subagents can now nest up to 5 levels deep — a dispatched implementer can fan out its own helpers for sub-steps. For codebase-wide changes (a migration, a cross-cutting refactor, an audit of every route), prefer a dynamic Workflow: describe the task naturally and include the word "workflow" so Claude generates an orchestration script that pipelines the work across many background subagents with verification built in. Use a single controller for a handful of tasks; escalate to a Workflow when the work-list is large or unknown in size.
Artifacts produced: Working code, committed to a feature branch
Gate: All planned tasks are implemented. Code compiles/runs without errors.
Phase 3: Test
Trigger: Implementation is complete.
- Use `ultraship:test-driven-development` to write tests for new code
- Run the full test suite to catch regressions
- If bugs are found, use `ultraship:systematic-debugging` to diagnose (not guess-and-fix)
Artifacts produced: Passing test suite, test coverage for new code
Gate: All tests pass. No known bugs in new code.
Phase 4: Review
Trigger: Tests pass.
- Use `ultraship:requesting-code-review` for self-review
- Run
/reviewfor automated code review with confidence scoring - Run
/securefor security scanning - Fix any high-confidence issues found
Artifacts produced: Review report, security scan results, fixes committed
Gate: No critical or high-severity issues remaining.
Phase 5: Ship
Trigger: Review is clean.
- Use `ultraship:verification-before-completion` for final verification
- Run
/shipfor the full pre-deploy scorecard (SEO, security, code quality, bundle) - If score is acceptable, run
/deployfor the deploy pipeline - Use `ultraship:finishing-a-development-branch` to merge/PR
Artifacts produced: Deploy to production, PR/merge to main
Gate: /ship scorecard is READY TO SHIP. Deploy succeeds.
Phase 6: Verify
Trigger: Deploy completes.
- Run
/canaryto verify production health - If canary detects issues, escalate to
/rescue - Save any deployment learnings via
/learn - Run
/retroat the end of the sprint to review overall progress
Artifacts produced: Canary report, learnings, retrospective
Workflow Rules
- Never skip phases. Each phase exists because skipping it causes problems.
- Gates are mandatory. Don't proceed to the next phase until the gate criteria are met.
- Artifacts chain forward. Each phase's output is the next phase's input.
- The user decides pace. Some sprints complete in an hour. Some take a week. The pipeline adapts.
- Small batches. Prefer shipping small features frequently over large features infrequently.
Quick Sprint (for small changes)
For bug fixes or small features (< 50 lines of code), compress the pipeline:
- Investigate → Use
/investigateto find root cause - Fix + Test → Fix the bug, write a test
- Verify → Run
/review, check tests pass - Ship → Push and run
/canary
Skip the full planning phase for changes that don't need it.
Sprint Status
Track sprint progress using tasks. At any point, the user can ask "where are we?" and get a clear answer:
Sprint: Add webhook retry logicPhase: 3/6 — TESTStatus: 2 tests written, 1 failing (timeout issue in retry delay)Next: Fix failing test, then proceed to REVIEW