version: "1.0.1" name: decision-records description: > Create, update, or manage decision records in homeracker. Use this skill when comparing alternative solutions and choosing one, changing behavior of CLI tools or build processes or model conventions, making trade-offs that future contributors need to understand, or superseding a previous decision. USE FOR: creating new decision records, looking up existing decisions, superseding outdated decisions, documenting rationale behind tooling or architecture choices. DO NOT USE FOR: routine config changes, version bumps, dependency updates, or changes that are self-explanatory from the code or commit message.

📋 Decision Records — homeracker Skill

This skill guides the creation and management of lightweight decision records that capture the why behind architecture, tooling, and workflow decisions.

Decision records help contributors and AI agents understand the original intent behind choices, especially when the reasoning isn't obvious from the code alone.

1. Determine the Action

2. Look Up Existing Decisions

Before creating a new decision, always check if one already exists:

1. Read docs/decisions/README.md for the active decisions table.
2. If a related decision exists, determine whether to supersede it (§4) or reference it.

3. Create a New Decision

3.1 File Location & Naming

• Location: docs/decisions/
• Naming: kebab-case-title.md — name after the component/topic and action.
• ✅ image-hosting-assets-repo.md
• ✅ unify-export-png-into-scadm.md
• ❌ ADR-001-image-hosting.md (no numeric prefixes)
• The title should use a present-tense imperative verb phrase describing the decision.

3.2 Template

Use this exact structure:

# 📋 Title (present-tense imperative verb phrase)
 
## 📌 Status
 
**Accepted** — YYYY-MM-DD
 
## 🤔 Context
 
What problem or situation triggered this decision? What constraints exist?
If this supersedes a previous decision, link the predecessor commit here.
 
## 🔧 Decision
 
What did we decide and why? Include alternatives considered and why they were rejected.
 
## 📊 Consequences
 
What follows from this decision? Include both positive and negative effects.

3.3 Writing Quality Criteria

• Context must explain the problem clearly enough that someone unfamiliar can understand it.
• Decision must state the choice explicitly and include alternatives considered with brief reasons for rejection.
• Consequences must include both positive and negative effects — every decision has trade-offs.
• Keep it concise. Prefer bullet points over prose. Link to code, PRs, or other docs rather than duplicating content.
• Use the homeracker emoji conventions (📋 title, 📌 Status, 🤔 Context, 🔧 Decision, 📊 Consequences).

3.4 After Creating the Decision

1. Update the decisions index: Add a row to docs/decisions/README.md (keep sorted by date descending).
2. Cross-link from related docs: Reference the decision from READMEs, instructions, or other decisions where viable.

4. Supersede a Decision

When a previous decision is being replaced:

1. Create a new decision record (§3) explaining the new choice.
2. In the new record's Context, link to the last commit containing the old decision so readers can find it in history.

Format: Supersedes [old-decision.md](https://github.com/kellerlabs/homeracker/blob/<commit-sha>/docs/decisions/old-decision.md)

1. Delete the old decision file — it remains available in git history.
2. Update docs/decisions/README.md to remove the old entry and add the new one.

5. When NOT to Write a Decision

Skip decision records for:

• Routine config changes, version bumps, or dependency updates
• Changes that are self-explanatory from the code or commit message
• Temporary workarounds (use code comments instead)
• Single-option situations where there was nothing to decide

6. Reference Example

See docs/decisions/image-hosting-assets-repo.md for a well-structured example covering context, alternatives considered, and positive/negative consequences.

7. Humanize the Prose

After writing or editing a decision record, run the `humanizer` skill over it to strip AI tells. ADRs are reference text, so use its neutral register (no first person or injected opinions), just plain, concrete prose.