Skill v1.0.1

currentLLM-judged scan95/100

lamm-mit/scienceclaw/drug-target-validation

1 files

──Details

PublishedMay 15, 2026 at 05:12 AM

Content Hashsha256:b5f5e43b72b624a3...

Git SHA20ac3565abde

Bump Typepatch

Compare with v1.0.0

──Files

Files (1 file, 39.1 KB)

SKILL.md39.1 KBactive

SKILL.md · 1215 lines · 39.1 KB

version: "1.0.1" name: drug-target-validation description: ToolUniverse workflow — Drug Target Validation source: https://github.com/mims-harvard/ToolUniverse/tree/main/skills/tooluniverse-drug-target-validation metadata:

name: tooluniverse-drug-target-validation description: Comprehensive computational validation of drug targets for early-stage drug discovery. Evaluates targets across 10 dimensions (disambiguation, disease association, druggability, chemical matter, clinical precedent, safety, pathway context, validation evidence, structural insights, validation roadmap) using 60+ ToolUniverse tools. Produces a quantitative Target Validation Score (0-100) with GO/NO-GO recommendation. Use when users ask about target validation, druggability assessment, target prioritization, or "is X a good drug target for Y?"

Drug Target Validation Pipeline

Validate drug target hypotheses using multi-dimensional computational evidence before committing to wet-lab work. Produces a quantitative Target Validation Score (0-100) with priority tier classification and GO/NO-GO recommendation.

KEY PRINCIPLES:

Report-first approach - Create report file FIRST, then populate progressively
Target disambiguation FIRST - Resolve all identifiers before analysis
Evidence grading - Grade all evidence as T1 (experimental) to T4 (computational)
Disease-specific - Tailor analysis to disease context when provided
Modality-aware - Consider small molecule vs biologics tractability
Safety-first - Prominently flag safety concerns early
Quantitative scoring - Every dimension scored numerically (0-100 composite)
Negative results documented - "No data" is data; empty sections are failures
Source references - Every statement must cite tool/database
Completeness checklist - Mandatory section showing analysis coverage
English-first queries - Always use English terms in tool calls. Respond in user's language

When to Use This Skill

Apply when users:

Ask "Is [target] a good drug target for [disease]?"
Need target validation or druggability assessment
Want to compare targets for drug discovery prioritization
Ask about safety risks of modulating a target
Need chemical starting points for target validation
Ask about pathway context for a target
Need a GO/NO-GO recommendation for a target
Want a comprehensive target dossier for investment decisions

NOT for (use other skills instead):

General target biology overview -> Use tooluniverse-target-research
Drug compound profiling -> Use tooluniverse-drug-research
Variant interpretation -> Use tooluniverse-variant-interpretation
Disease research -> Use tooluniverse-disease-research

Input Parameters

Parameter	Required	Description	Example
target	Yes	Gene symbol, protein name, or UniProt ID	`EGFR`, `P00533`, `Epidermal growth factor receptor`
disease	No	Disease/indication for context	`Non-small cell lung cancer`, `Pancreatic cancer`
modality	No	Preferred therapeutic modality	`small molecule`, `antibody`, `protein therapeutic`, `PROTAC`

Target Validation Scoring System

Score Components (Total: 0-100)

Disease Association (0-30 points):

Genetic evidence: 0-10 (GWAS, rare variants, somatic mutations)
Literature evidence: 0-10 (publications, clinical studies)
Pathway evidence: 0-10 (disease pathway involvement)

Druggability (0-25 points):

Structural tractability: 0-10 (structure quality, binding pockets)
Chemical matter: 0-10 (known compounds, bioactivity data)
Target class: 0-5 (validated target family bonus)

Safety Profile (0-20 points):

Tissue expression selectivity: 0-5 (expression in critical tissues)
Genetic validation: 0-10 (knockout phenotypes, human genetics)
Known adverse events: 0-5 (safety signals from modulators)

Clinical Precedent (0-15 points):

Approved drugs: 15 (strong precedent, validated target)
Clinical trials: 10 (moderate precedent)
Preclinical compounds: 5 (weak precedent)
None: 0 (novel target)

Validation Evidence (0-10 points):

Functional studies: 0-5 (CRISPR, siRNA, biochemical)
Disease models: 0-5 (animal models, patient data)

Priority Tiers

Score	Tier	Recommendation
80-100	Tier 1	Highly validated - proceed with confidence
60-79	Tier 2	Good target - needs focused validation
40-59	Tier 3	Moderate risk - significant validation needed
0-39	Tier 4	High risk - consider alternatives

Evidence Grading System

Tier	Symbol	Criteria	Examples
T1	[T1]	Direct mechanistic, human clinical proof	FDA-approved drug, crystal structure with mechanism, patient mutation
T2	[T2]	Functional studies, model organism	siRNA phenotype, mouse KO, biochemical assay, CRISPR screen
T3	[T3]	Association, screen hits, computational	GWAS hit, DepMap essentiality, expression correlation
T4	[T4]	Mention, review, text-mined, predicted	Review article, database annotation, AlphaFold prediction

Phase 0: Target Disambiguation & ID Resolution (ALWAYS FIRST)

Objective: Resolve target to ALL needed identifiers before any analysis.

Resolution Strategy

python

# Step 1: Determine input type and get initial identifiers
# If gene symbol (e.g., "EGFR"):
mygene = tu.tools.MyGene_query_genes(query="EGFR", species="human", fields="symbol,name,ensembl.gene,uniprot.Swiss-Prot,entrezgene")
# Extract: ensembl_id, uniprot_id, entrez_id, symbol, name
# If UniProt ID (e.g., "P00533"):
uniprot = tu.tools.UniProt_get_entry_by_accession(accession="P00533")
# Extract: gene names, Ensembl xrefs, function
# Step 2: Resolve Ensembl ID and get versioned ID for GTEx
ensembl = tu.tools.ensembl_lookup_gene(gene_id=ensembl_id, species="homo_sapiens")
# CRITICAL: species parameter is REQUIRED
# CRITICAL: Response is wrapped in {status, data, url, content_type} - access via ensembl['data']
ensembl_data = ensembl.get('data', ensembl) if isinstance(ensembl, dict) else ensembl
# Extract: version for versioned_id (e.g., "ENSG00000146648.18")
# Step 3: Get Ensembl cross-references
xrefs = tu.tools.ensembl_get_xrefs(id=ensembl_id)
# Extract: HGNC, UniProt, EntrezGene mappings
# Step 4: Get OpenTargets target info
ot_target = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_target_id_description_by_name(targetName="EGFR")
# Verify ensemblId matches
# Step 5: Get ChEMBL target ID
chembl_targets = tu.tools.ChEMBL_search_targets(pref_name__contains="EGFR", organism="Homo sapiens", limit=5)
# Extract: target_chembl_id for later use
# Step 6: Get UniProt function summary
function_info = tu.tools.UniProt_get_function_by_accession(accession=uniprot_id)
# Returns list of strings (NOT dict)
# Step 7: Get alternative names for collision detection
alt_names = tu.tools.UniProt_get_alternative_names_by_accession(accession=uniprot_id)

Identifier Resolution Output

markdown

## 1. Target Identity
 
| Database | Identifier | Verified |
|----------|-----------|----------|
| Gene Symbol | EGFR | Yes |
| Full Name | Epidermal growth factor receptor | Yes |
| Ensembl | ENSG00000146648 | Yes |
| Ensembl (versioned) | ENSG00000146648.18 | Yes |
| UniProt | P00533 | Yes |
| Entrez Gene | 1956 | Yes |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL203 | Yes |
| HGNC | HGNC:3236 | Yes |
 
**Protein Function**: [from UniProt_get_function_by_accession]
**Subcellular Location**: [from UniProt_get_subcellular_location_by_accession]
**Target Class**: [from OpenTargets_get_target_classes_by_ensemblID]

Known Parameter Corrections

Tool	WRONG Parameter	CORRECT Parameter
`ensembl_lookup_gene`	`id`	`gene_id` (+ `species="homo_sapiens"` REQUIRED)
`Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways`	`uniprot_id`	`id`
`ensembl_get_xrefs`	`gene_id`	`id`
`GTEx_get_median_gene_expression`	`gencode_id` only	`gencode_id` + `operation="median"`
`OpenTargets_*`	`ensemblID` (uppercase)	`ensemblId` (camelCase)
`OpenTargets_get_publications_*`	`ensemblId`	`entityId`
`OpenTargets_get_associated_drugs_by_target_ensemblID`	`ensemblId` only	`ensemblId` + `size` (REQUIRED)
`MyGene_query_genes`	`q`	`query`
`PubMed_search_articles`	returns `{articles: [...]}`	returns plain list of dicts
`UniProt_get_function_by_accession`	returns dict	returns list of strings
`HPA_get_rna_expression_by_source`	`ensembl_id`	`gene_name` + `source_type` + `source_name` (ALL required)
`alphafold_get_prediction`	`uniprot_accession`	`qualifier`
`drugbank_get_safety_*`	simple params	`query`, `case_sensitive`, `exact_match`, `limit` (ALL required)

Phase 1: Disease Association Evidence (0-30 points)

Objective: Quantify the strength of target-disease association from genetic, literature, and pathway evidence.

1A. OpenTargets Disease Associations (Primary)

python

# Get ALL disease associations for target
diseases = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes_by_target_ensembl(ensemblId=ensembl_id)
# If specific disease provided, get detailed evidence
if disease_name:
    disease_info = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_disease_id_description_by_name(diseaseName=disease_name)
    efo_id = disease_info.get('id')  # e.g., "EFO_0003060"
    evidence = tu.tools.OpenTargets_target_disease_evidence(
        efoId=efo_id, ensemblId=ensembl_id
    )
    # Get evidence by data source for detailed breakdown
    datasource_evidence = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_evidence_by_datasource(
        efoId=efo_id, ensemblId=ensembl_id,
        datasourceIds=["ot_genetics_portal", "eva", "gene2phenotype", "genomics_england", "uniprot_literature"],
        size=100
    )

1B. GWAS Genetic Evidence

python

# GWAS associations for target gene
gwas_snps = tu.tools.gwas_get_snps_for_gene(mapped_gene=gene_symbol, size=50)
# If specific disease, search for trait-specific associations
if disease_name:
    gwas_studies = tu.tools.gwas_search_studies(query=disease_name, size=20)

1C. Constraint Scores (gnomAD)

python

# Genetic constraint - intolerance to loss of function
constraints = tu.tools.gnomad_get_gene_constraints(gene_symbol=gene_symbol)
# Extract: pLI, LOEUF, missense_z, pRec
# High pLI (>0.9) = highly intolerant to LoF = likely essential

1D. Literature Evidence

python

# PubMed for target-disease association
articles = tu.tools.PubMed_search_articles(
    query=f'"{gene_symbol}" AND "{disease_name}" AND (target OR therapeutic OR inhibitor)',
    limit=50
)
# PubMed_search_articles returns a plain list of dicts
# OpenTargets publications
pubs = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_publications_by_target_ensemblID(entityId=ensembl_id)

Scoring Logic - Disease Association

Genetic Evidence (0-10):
  - GWAS hits for specific disease: +3 per significant locus (max 6)
  - Rare variant evidence (ClinVar pathogenic): +2
  - Somatic mutations in disease: +2
  - pLI > 0.9 (essential gene): +2
 
Literature Evidence (0-10):
  - >100 publications on target+disease: 10
  - 50-100 publications: 7
  - 10-50 publications: 5
  - 1-10 publications: 3
  - 0 publications: 0
 
Pathway Evidence (0-10):
  - OpenTargets overall score > 0.8: 10
  - Score 0.5-0.8: 7
  - Score 0.2-0.5: 4
  - Score < 0.2: 1

Phase 2: Druggability Assessment (0-25 points)

Objective: Assess whether the target is amenable to therapeutic intervention.

2A. OpenTargets Tractability

python

# Tractability assessment across modalities
tractability = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_target_tractability_by_ensemblID(ensemblId=ensembl_id)
# Returns: label, modality (SM, AB, PR, OC), value (boolean/score)
# Modalities: Small Molecule, Antibody, PROTAC, Other Clinical

2B. Target Class & Family

python

# Target classification (kinase, GPCR, ion channel, etc.)
target_classes = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_target_classes_by_ensemblID(ensemblId=ensembl_id)
# Pharos target development level
pharos = tu.tools.Pharos_get_target(gene=gene_symbol)
# TDL: Tclin (approved drug) > Tchem (compounds) > Tbio (biology) > Tdark (unknown)
# DGIdb druggability categories
druggability = tu.tools.DGIdb_get_gene_druggability(genes=[gene_symbol])

2C. Structural Tractability

python

# PDB structures available
if uniprot_id:
    uniprot_entry = tu.tools.UniProt_get_entry_by_accession(accession=uniprot_id)
    # Extract PDB cross-references from entry
# AlphaFold prediction
alphafold = tu.tools.alphafold_get_prediction(qualifier=uniprot_id)
alphafold_summary = tu.tools.alphafold_get_summary(qualifier=uniprot_id)
# For top PDB structures, analyze binding pockets
# ProteinsPlus DoGSiteScorer for pocket detection
for pdb_id in top_pdb_ids[:3]:
    pockets = tu.tools.ProteinsPlus_predict_binding_sites(pdb_id=pdb_id)
    # Returns predicted druggable pockets with scores

2D. Chemical Probes & Enabling Packages

python

# Chemical probes (validated tool compounds)
probes = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_chemical_probes_by_target_ensemblID(ensemblId=ensembl_id)
# Target Enabling Packages (TEPs)
teps = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_target_enabling_packages_by_ensemblID(ensemblId=ensembl_id)

Scoring Logic - Druggability

Structural Tractability (0-10):
  - High-res co-crystal structure with ligand: 10
  - PDB structure available, pockets detected: 7
  - AlphaFold only, confident pocket prediction: 5
  - AlphaFold low confidence / no structure: 2
  - No structural data: 0
 
Chemical Matter (0-10):
  - Known drug-like compounds (IC50 < 100nM): 10
  - Tool compounds (IC50 < 1uM): 7
  - HTS hits only (IC50 > 1uM): 4
  - No known ligands: 0
 
Target Class Bonus (0-5):
  - Validated druggable family (kinase, GPCR, nuclear receptor): 5
  - Enzyme, ion channel: 4
  - Protein-protein interaction, transporter: 2
  - Novel/unknown class: 0

Phase 3: Known Modulators & Chemical Matter (Feeds into Phase 2 scoring)

Objective: Identify existing chemical starting points for target validation.

3A. ChEMBL Bioactivity

python

# Search for ChEMBL target
chembl_targets = tu.tools.ChEMBL_search_targets(
    pref_name__contains=gene_symbol, organism="Homo sapiens", limit=10
)
# Get activities for best matching target
target_chembl_id = chembl_targets[0]['target_chembl_id']
activities = tu.tools.ChEMBL_get_target_activities(
    target_chembl_id__exact=target_chembl_id, limit=100
)
# Parse: compound IDs, pChEMBL values, activity types (IC50, Ki, Kd)
# Filter: potent compounds (pChEMBL >= 6.0 = IC50 <= 1uM)

3B. BindingDB Ligands

python

# Experimental binding data
ligands = tu.tools.BindingDB_get_ligands_by_uniprot(
    uniprot=uniprot_id, affinity_cutoff=10000  # nM
)
# Returns: SMILES, affinity_type (Ki/IC50/Kd), affinity value, PMID

3C. PubChem Bioassays

python

# HTS screening data
assays = tu.tools.PubChem_search_assays_by_target_gene(gene_symbol=gene_symbol)
# Get details for top assays
for aid in assay_ids[:5]:
    summary = tu.tools.PubChem_get_assay_summary(aid=str(aid))
    targets = tu.tools.PubChem_get_assay_targets(aid=str(aid))
    actives = tu.tools.PubChem_get_assay_active_compounds(aid=str(aid))

3D. Known Drugs Targeting This Protein

python

# OpenTargets known drugs
drugs = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_associated_drugs_by_target_ensemblID(
    ensemblId=ensembl_id, size=25
)
# ChEMBL drug mechanisms
drug_mechanisms = tu.tools.ChEMBL_search_mechanisms(
    target_chembl_id=target_chembl_id, limit=50
)
# Drug interaction databases
dgidb = tu.tools.DGIdb_get_gene_info(genes=[gene_symbol])

Report Format - Chemical Matter

markdown

### 4. Known Modulators & Chemical Matter
 
#### 4.1 Approved Drugs
| Drug | ChEMBL ID | Mechanism | Phase | Indication | Source |
|------|-----------|-----------|-------|------------|--------|
| Erlotinib | CHEMBL553 | Inhibitor | 4 | NSCLC | [T1] OpenTargets |
| Gefitinib | CHEMBL939 | Inhibitor | 4 | NSCLC | [T1] OpenTargets |
 
#### 4.2 ChEMBL Bioactivity Summary
**Total Activities**: 12,456 datapoints across 2,341 assays
**Most Potent Compound**: CHEMBL413456 (IC50 = 0.3 nM) [T1]
**Chemical Series**: 8 distinct scaffolds with pChEMBL >= 7.0
**Selectivity Data**: Available for 45 compounds (kinase panel)
 
#### 4.3 BindingDB Ligands
**Total Ligands**: 856 with measured affinity
**Best Affinity**: 0.1 nM (Ki)
**Affinity Distribution**: <1nM: 23, 1-10nM: 89, 10-100nM: 234, 100nM-1uM: 510
 
#### 4.4 Chemical Probes
| Probe | Source | Potency | Selectivity | Use |
|-------|--------|---------|-------------|-----|
| SGC-1234 | SGC | IC50=5nM | >100x | In vitro |

Phase 4: Clinical Precedent (0-15 points)

Objective: Assess clinical validation from approved drugs and clinical trials.

4A. FDA-Approved Drugs

python

# FDA label information
fda_moa = tu.tools.FDA_get_mechanism_of_action_by_drug_name(drug_name=gene_symbol)
fda_indications = tu.tools.FDA_get_indications_by_drug_name(drug_name=known_drug_name)
# DrugBank pharmacology
drugbank_targets = tu.tools.drugbank_get_targets_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id(
    query=known_drug_name, case_sensitive=False, exact_match=False, limit=10
)
# DrugBank safety info
drugbank_safety = tu.tools.drugbank_get_safety_by_drug_name_or_drugbank_id(
    query=known_drug_name, case_sensitive=False, exact_match=False, limit=10
)

4B. Clinical Trials

python

# Active clinical trials targeting this protein
trials = tu.tools.search_clinical_trials(
    query_term=gene_symbol,
    intervention=gene_symbol,
    pageSize=50
)
# If specific disease context
if disease_name:
    disease_trials = tu.tools.search_clinical_trials(
        query_term=gene_symbol,
        condition=disease_name,
        pageSize=50
    )

4C. Failed Programs (Learn from Failures)

python

# Drug warnings and withdrawals
for drug_chembl_id in known_drug_ids:
    warnings = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_drug_warnings_by_chemblId(chemblId=drug_chembl_id)
    adverse = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_drug_adverse_events_by_chemblId(chemblId=drug_chembl_id)

Scoring Logic - Clinical Precedent

Clinical Precedent (0-15):
  - FDA-approved drug for SAME disease: 15
  - FDA-approved drug for DIFFERENT disease: 12
  - Phase 3 clinical trial: 10
  - Phase 2 clinical trial: 7
  - Phase 1 clinical trial: 5
  - Preclinical compounds only: 3
  - No clinical development: 0
 
Adjustment factors:
  - Failed clinical program for safety: -3
  - Drug withdrawal: -5
  - Multiple approved drugs (validated class): +2

Phase 5: Safety & Toxicity Considerations (0-20 points)

Objective: Identify safety risks from expression, genetics, and known adverse events.

5A. OpenTargets Safety Profile

python

safety = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_target_safety_profile_by_ensemblID(ensemblId=ensembl_id)
# Returns: safety liabilities, adverse effects, experimental toxicity

5B. Expression in Critical Tissues

python

# GTEx tissue expression (identifies essential organ expression)
gtex = tu.tools.GTEx_get_median_gene_expression(
    operation="median", gencode_id=ensembl_versioned_id
)
# If empty, try unversioned ID
# HPA expression
# NOTE: HPA_get_rna_expression_by_source requires gene_name, source_type, source_name
hpa = tu.tools.HPA_search_genes_by_query(search_query=gene_symbol)
hpa_details = tu.tools.HPA_get_comprehensive_gene_details_by_ensembl_id(ensembl_id=ensembl_id)
# Check expression in safety-critical tissues
# Heart, liver, kidney, brain, bone marrow = high risk if target is expressed

5C. Knockout Phenotypes

python

# Mouse model phenotypes
mouse_models = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_biological_mouse_models_by_ensemblID(ensemblId=ensembl_id)
# Genetic constraint (proxy for essentiality)
constraints = tu.tools.gnomad_get_gene_constraints(gene_symbol=gene_symbol)
# High pLI = essential gene = potential safety concern

5D. Known Adverse Events from Target Modulation

python

# For known drugs targeting this protein
for drug_name in known_drug_names:
    fda_adr = tu.tools.FDA_get_adverse_reactions_by_drug_name(drug_name=drug_name)
    fda_warnings = tu.tools.FDA_get_warnings_and_cautions_by_drug_name(drug_name=drug_name)
    fda_boxed = tu.tools.FDA_get_boxed_warning_info_by_drug_name(drug_name=drug_name)
    fda_contraindications = tu.tools.FDA_get_contraindications_by_drug_name(drug_name=drug_name)

5E. Homologs & Off-Target Risks

python

# Paralogs (close family members that might be hit)
homologs = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_target_homologues_by_ensemblID(ensemblId=ensembl_id)
# Paralogs with high sequence identity = selectivity challenge

Scoring Logic - Safety

Tissue Expression Selectivity (0-5):
  - Target restricted to disease tissue: 5
  - Low expression in heart/liver/kidney/brain: 4
  - Moderate expression in 1-2 critical tissues: 2
  - High expression in multiple critical tissues: 0
 
Genetic Validation (0-10):
  - Mouse KO viable, no severe phenotype: 10
  - Mouse KO viable with mild phenotype: 7
  - Mouse KO has concerning phenotype: 3
  - Mouse KO lethal: 0
  - No KO data, low pLI (<0.5): 5
  - No KO data, high pLI (>0.9): 2
 
Known Adverse Events (0-5):
  - No known safety signals: 5
  - Mild, manageable ADRs: 3
  - Serious ADRs reported: 1
  - Black box warning or drug withdrawal: 0

Phase 6: Pathway Context & Network Analysis

Objective: Understand the target's role in biological networks and disease pathways.

6A. Reactome Pathways

python

# Map target to pathways
pathways = tu.tools.Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways(id=uniprot_id)
# Get pathway details for top pathways
for pathway in top_pathways[:5]:
    detail = tu.tools.Reactome_get_pathway(id=pathway['stId'])
    reactions = tu.tools.Reactome_get_pathway_reactions(id=pathway['stId'])

6B. Protein-Protein Interactions

python

# STRING network
string_ppi = tu.tools.STRING_get_protein_interactions(
    protein_ids=[gene_symbol], species=9606, confidence_score=0.7
)
# Higher confidence = more reliable
# IntAct interactions (experimental)
intact_ppi = tu.tools.intact_get_interactions(identifier=uniprot_id)
# OpenTargets interactions
ot_ppi = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_target_interactions_by_ensemblID(ensemblId=ensembl_id)

6C. Functional Enrichment

python

# GO annotations
go_terms = tu.tools.OpenTargets_get_target_gene_ontology_by_ensemblID(ensemblId=ensembl_id)
# Direct GO query
go_annotations = tu.tools.GO_get_annotations_for_gene(gene_id=gene_symbol)
# STRING functional enrichment of interaction partners
enrichment = tu.tools.STRING_functional_enrichment(
    protein_ids=[gene_symbol], species=9606
)

Report Format - Pathway Context

markdown

### 7. Pathway Context & Network Analysis
 
#### 7.1 Key Pathways
| Pathway | Reactome ID | Relevance to Disease | Evidence |
|---------|-------------|---------------------|----------|
| EGFR signaling | R-HSA-177929 | Driver pathway in NSCLC | [T1] |
| RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK | R-HSA-5673001 | Downstream effector | [T1] |
| PI3K-AKT signaling | R-HSA-2219528 | Resistance mechanism | [T2] |
 
#### 7.2 Protein-Protein Interactions
**Total Interactors**: 45 (STRING confidence > 0.7)
**Key Interactors**: GRB2, SHC1, PLCG1, PIK3CA, STAT3
 
#### 7.3 Pathway Redundancy Assessment
**Compensation Risk**: MODERATE
-Parallel pathways: HER2, HER3 can compensate
-Feedback loops: RAS activation bypasses EGFR
-Downstream convergence: MEK/ERK shared with other RTKs

Phase 7: Validation Evidence (0-10 points)

Objective: Assess existing functional validation data.

7A. DepMap Essentiality (CRISPR/RNAi)

python

# Gene essentiality in cancer cell lines
deps = tu.tools.DepMap_get_gene_dependencies(gene_symbol=gene_symbol)
# Negative scores = essential (cells die upon KO)
# Score < -0.5: moderately essential
# Score < -1.0: strongly essential

7B. Literature Validation Evidence

python

# Search for functional studies
validation_papers = tu.tools.PubMed_search_articles(
    query=f'"{gene_symbol}" AND (CRISPR OR siRNA OR knockdown OR knockout OR "loss of function") AND "{disease_name}"',
    limit=30
)
# Search for biomarker studies
biomarker_papers = tu.tools.PubMed_search_articles(
    query=f'"{gene_symbol}" AND (biomarker OR "target engagement" OR "pharmacodynamic")',
    limit=20
)

7C. Animal Model Evidence

python

# Mouse phenotypes from OpenTargets (already retrieved in Phase 5)
# Reuse mouse_models data
# CTD gene-disease associations (complementary)
ctd_diseases = tu.tools.CTD_get_gene_diseases(input_terms=gene_symbol)

Scoring Logic - Validation Evidence

Functional Studies (0-5):
  - CRISPR KO shows disease-relevant phenotype: 5
  - siRNA knockdown shows phenotype: 4
  - Biochemical assay validates mechanism: 3
  - Overexpression study only: 2
  - No functional data: 0
 
Disease Models (0-5):
  - Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) response: 5
  - Genetically engineered mouse model: 4
  - Cell line model: 3
  - In silico model only: 1
  - No model data: 0

Phase 8: Structural Insights

Objective: Leverage structural biology for druggability and mechanism understanding.

8A. PDB Structures

python

# Get PDB entries from UniProt cross-references
uniprot_entry = tu.tools.UniProt_get_entry_by_accession(accession=uniprot_id)
# Parse: uniProtKBCrossReferences where database == "PDB"
# Get details for each PDB
for pdb_id in pdb_ids[:10]:
    metadata = tu.tools.get_protein_metadata_by_pdb_id(pdb_id=pdb_id)
    quality = tu.tools.pdbe_get_entry_quality(pdb_id=pdb_id)
    summary = tu.tools.pdbe_get_entry_summary(pdb_id=pdb_id)
    experiment = tu.tools.pdbe_get_entry_experiment(pdb_id=pdb_id)
    molecules = tu.tools.pdbe_get_entry_molecules(pdb_id=pdb_id)

8B. AlphaFold Prediction

python

alphafold = tu.tools.alphafold_get_prediction(qualifier=uniprot_id)
alphafold_info = tu.tools.alphafold_get_summary(qualifier=uniprot_id)
# Check pLDDT scores for confidence

8C. Binding Pocket Analysis

python

# ProteinsPlus DoGSiteScorer for best PDB structure
pockets = tu.tools.ProteinsPlus_predict_binding_sites(pdb_id=best_pdb_id)
# Returns: pocket locations, druggability scores, volume, surface
# Interaction diagram for co-crystal structures
if has_ligand:
    diagram = tu.tools.ProteinsPlus_generate_interaction_diagram(pdb_id=pdb_id)

8D. Domain Architecture

python

# InterPro domains
domains = tu.tools.InterPro_get_protein_domains(uniprot_accession=uniprot_id)
# Domain details for key domains
for domain in domains[:5]:
    detail = tu.tools.InterPro_get_domain_details(entry_id=domain['accession'])

Phase 9: Literature Deep Dive

Objective: Comprehensive literature analysis with collision-aware search.

9A. Collision Detection

python

# Detect naming collisions before literature search
test_results = tu.tools.PubMed_search_articles(
    query=f'"{gene_symbol}"[Title]', limit=20
)
# PubMed returns plain list of dicts
# Check if >20% of results are off-topic (no biology terms)
# If collision detected, add filters: AND (protein OR gene OR receptor OR kinase)

9B. Publication Metrics

python

# Total publications
total = tu.tools.PubMed_search_articles(
    query=f'"{gene_symbol}" AND (protein OR gene)', limit=1
)
# Check total_count field
# Recent publications (5-year trend)
recent = tu.tools.PubMed_search_articles(
    query=f'"{gene_symbol}" AND (protein OR gene) AND ("2021"[PDAT] : "2026"[PDAT])',
    limit=50
)
# Drug-focused publications
drug_pubs = tu.tools.PubMed_search_articles(
    query=f'"{gene_symbol}" AND (drug OR therapeutic OR inhibitor OR antibody)',
    limit=30
)
# EuropePMC for broader coverage
epmc = tu.tools.EuropePMC_search_articles(
    query=f'"{gene_symbol}" AND drug target',
    limit=30
)

9C. Key Reviews and Landmark Papers

python

# Reviews for target overview
reviews = tu.tools.PubMed_search_articles(
    query=f'"{gene_symbol}" AND drug target AND review[pt]',
    limit=10
)
# OpenAlex for citation metrics
openalex_works = tu.tools.openalex_search_works(
    query=f'{gene_symbol} drug target', limit=20
)

Phase 10: Validation Roadmap (Synthesis)

Objective: Generate actionable recommendations based on all evidence.

This phase synthesizes all previous phases into:

Target Validation Score (0-100)
Priority Tier (1-4)
GO/NO-GO Recommendation
Recommended Experiments
Tool Compounds for Testing
Biomarker Strategy
Key Risks & Mitigations

Score Calculation

python

def calculate_validation_score(phase_results):
    """
    Calculate Target Validation Score (0-100).
    Components:
    - Disease Association: 0-30
    - Druggability: 0-25
    - Safety: 0-20
    - Clinical Precedent: 0-15
    - Validation Evidence: 0-10
    """
    score = {
        'disease_genetic': 0,      # 0-10
        'disease_literature': 0,   # 0-10
        'disease_pathway': 0,      # 0-10
        'drug_structural': 0,      # 0-10
        'drug_chemical': 0,        # 0-10
        'drug_class': 0,           # 0-5
        'safety_expression': 0,    # 0-5
        'safety_genetic': 0,       # 0-10
        'safety_adverse': 0,       # 0-5
        'clinical': 0,             # 0-15
        'validation_functional': 0, # 0-5
        'validation_models': 0,    # 0-5
    }
    # ... scoring logic from each phase ...
    total = sum(score.values())
    if total >= 80:
        tier = "Tier 1"
        recommendation = "GO - Highly validated target"
    elif total >= 60:
        tier = "Tier 2"
        recommendation = "CONDITIONAL GO - Needs focused validation"
    elif total >= 40:
        tier = "Tier 3"
        recommendation = "CAUTION - Significant validation needed"
    else:
        tier = "Tier 4"
        recommendation = "NO-GO - Consider alternatives"
    return total, tier, recommendation, score

Report Template

File: [TARGET]_[DISEASE]_validation_report.md

markdown

# Drug Target Validation Report: [TARGET]
 
**Target**: [Gene Symbol] ([Full Name])
**Disease Context**: [Disease Name] (if provided)
**Modality**: [Small molecule / Antibody / etc.] (if specified)
**Generated**: [Date]
**Status**: In Progress
 
---
 
## Executive Summary
 
**Target Validation Score**: [XX/100]
**Priority Tier**: [Tier X] - [Description]
**Recommendation**: [GO / CONDITIONAL GO / CAUTION / NO-GO]
 
**Key Findings**:
-[1-sentence disease association strength with evidence grade]
-[1-sentence druggability assessment]
-[1-sentence safety profile]
-[1-sentence clinical precedent]
 
**Critical Risks**:
-[Top risk 1]
-[Top risk 2]
 
---
 
## Validation Scorecard
 
| Dimension | Score | Max | Assessment | Key Evidence |
|-----------|-------|-----|------------|--------------|
| **Disease Association** | | 30 | | |
| - Genetic evidence | | 10 | | |
| - Literature evidence | | 10 | | |
| - Pathway evidence | | 10 | | |
| **Druggability** | | 25 | | |
| - Structural tractability | | 10 | | |
| - Chemical matter | | 10 | | |
| - Target class | | 5 | | |
| **Safety Profile** | | 20 | | |
| - Expression selectivity | | 5 | | |
| - Genetic validation | | 10 | | |
| - Known ADRs | | 5 | | |
| **Clinical Precedent** | | 15 | | |
| **Validation Evidence** | | 10 | | |
| - Functional studies | | 5 | | |
| - Disease models | | 5 | | |
| **TOTAL** | **XX** | **100** | **[Tier]** | |
 
---
 
## 1. Target Identity
[Researching...]
 
## 2. Disease Association Evidence
### 2.1 OpenTargets Disease Associations
[Researching...]
### 2.2 GWAS Genetic Evidence
[Researching...]
### 2.3 Constraint Scores (gnomAD)
[Researching...]
### 2.4 Literature Evidence
[Researching...]
 
## 3. Druggability Assessment
### 3.1 Tractability (OpenTargets)
[Researching...]
### 3.2 Target Classification
[Researching...]
### 3.3 Structural Tractability
[Researching...]
### 3.4 Chemical Probes & Enabling Packages
[Researching...]
 
## 4. Known Modulators & Chemical Matter
### 4.1 Approved/Clinical Drugs
[Researching...]
### 4.2 ChEMBL Bioactivity
[Researching...]
### 4.3 BindingDB Ligands
[Researching...]
### 4.4 PubChem Bioassays
[Researching...]
### 4.5 Chemical Probes
[Researching...]
 
## 5. Clinical Precedent
### 5.1 FDA-Approved Drugs
[Researching...]
### 5.2 Clinical Trial Landscape
[Researching...]
### 5.3 Failed Programs & Lessons
[Researching...]
 
## 6. Safety & Toxicity Profile
### 6.1 OpenTargets Safety Liabilities
[Researching...]
### 6.2 Expression in Critical Tissues
[Researching...]
### 6.3 Knockout Phenotypes
[Researching...]
### 6.4 Known Adverse Events
[Researching...]
### 6.5 Paralog & Off-Target Risks
[Researching...]
 
## 7. Pathway Context & Network Analysis
### 7.1 Biological Pathways
[Researching...]
### 7.2 Protein-Protein Interactions
[Researching...]
### 7.3 Functional Enrichment
[Researching...]
### 7.4 Pathway Redundancy Assessment
[Researching...]
 
## 8. Validation Evidence
### 8.1 Target Essentiality (DepMap)
[Researching...]
### 8.2 Functional Studies
[Researching...]
### 8.3 Animal Models
[Researching...]
### 8.4 Biomarker Potential
[Researching...]
 
## 9. Structural Insights
### 9.1 Experimental Structures (PDB)
[Researching...]
### 9.2 AlphaFold Prediction
[Researching...]
### 9.3 Binding Pocket Analysis
[Researching...]
### 9.4 Domain Architecture
[Researching...]
 
## 10. Literature Landscape
### 10.1 Publication Metrics
[Researching...]
### 10.2 Key Publications
[Researching...]
### 10.3 Research Trend
[Researching...]
 
## 11. Validation Roadmap
### 11.1 Recommended Validation Experiments
[Researching...]
### 11.2 Tool Compounds for Testing
[Researching...]
### 11.3 Biomarker Strategy
[Researching...]
### 11.4 Clinical Biomarker Candidates
[Researching...]
### 11.5 Disease Models to Test
[Researching...]
 
## 12. Risk Assessment
### 12.1 Key Risks
[Researching...]
### 12.2 Mitigation Strategies
[Researching...]
### 12.3 Competitive Landscape
[Researching...]
 
## 13. Completeness Checklist
[To be populated post-audit...]
 
## 14. Data Sources & Methodology
[Will be populated as research progresses...]

Completeness Checklist (MANDATORY)

Before finalizing, verify:

markdown

## 13. Completeness Checklist
 
### Phase Coverage
-[ ] Phase 0: Target disambiguation (all IDs resolved)
-[ ] Phase 1: Disease association (OT + GWAS + gnomAD + literature)
-[ ] Phase 2: Druggability (tractability + class + structure + probes)
-[ ] Phase 3: Chemical matter (ChEMBL + BindingDB + PubChem + drugs)
-[ ] Phase 4: Clinical precedent (FDA + trials + failures)
-[ ] Phase 5: Safety (OT safety + expression + KO + ADRs + paralogs)
-[ ] Phase 6: Pathway context (Reactome + STRING + GO)
-[ ] Phase 7: Validation evidence (DepMap + literature + models)
-[ ] Phase 8: Structural insights (PDB + AlphaFold + pockets + domains)
-[ ] Phase 9: Literature (collision-aware + metrics + key papers)
-[ ] Phase 10: Validation roadmap (score + recommendations)
 
### Data Quality
-[ ] All scores justified with specific data
-[ ] Evidence grades (T1-T4) assigned to key claims
-[ ] Negative results documented (not left blank)
-[ ] Failed tools with fallbacks documented
-[ ] Source citations for all data points
 
### Scoring
-[ ] All 12 score components calculated
-[ ] Total score summed correctly
-[ ] Priority tier assigned
-[ ] GO/NO-GO recommendation justified

Fallback Chains

Primary Tool	Fallback 1	Fallback 2	If All Fail
`OpenTargets_get_diseases_phenotypes_*`	`CTD_get_gene_diseases`	PubMed search	Note in report
`GTEx_get_median_gene_expression` (versioned)	GTEx (unversioned)	`HPA_search_genes_by_query`	Document gap
`ChEMBL_get_target_activities`	`BindingDB_get_ligands_by_uniprot`	`DGIdb_get_gene_info`	Note in report
`gnomad_get_gene_constraints`	`OpenTargets_get_target_constraint_info_*`	-	Note as unavailable
`Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways`	`OpenTargets_get_target_gene_ontology_*`	-	Use GO only
`STRING_get_protein_interactions`	`intact_get_interactions`	`OpenTargets interactions`	Note in report
`ProteinsPlus_predict_binding_sites`	`alphafold_get_prediction`	Literature pockets	Note as limited

Modality-Specific Considerations

Small Molecule Focus

Emphasize: binding pockets, ChEMBL compounds, Lipinski compliance
Key tractability: OpenTargets SM tractability bucket
Structure: co-crystal structures with small molecule ligands
Chemical matter: IC50/Ki/Kd data from ChEMBL/BindingDB

Antibody Focus

Emphasize: extracellular domains, cell surface expression, glycosylation
Key tractability: OpenTargets AB tractability bucket
Structure: ectodomain structures, epitope mapping
Expression: surface expression in disease vs normal tissue

PROTAC Focus

Emphasize: intracellular targets, surface lysines, E3 ligase proximity
Key tractability: OpenTargets PROTAC tractability
Structure: full-length structures for linker design
Chemical matter: known binders + E3 ligase binders

Quick Reference: Verified Tool Parameters

Tool	Parameters	Notes
`ensembl_lookup_gene`	`gene_id`, `species`	species="homo_sapiens" REQUIRED; response wrapped in `{status, data, url, content_type}`
`OpenTargets_get_*_by_ensemblID`	`ensemblId`	camelCase, NOT ensemblID
`OpenTargets_get_publications_by_target_ensemblID`	`entityId`	NOT ensemblId
`OpenTargets_get_associated_drugs_by_target_ensemblID`	`ensemblId`, `size`	size is REQUIRED
`OpenTargets_target_disease_evidence`	`efoId`, `ensemblId`	Both REQUIRED
`GTEx_get_median_gene_expression`	`operation`, `gencode_id`	operation="median" REQUIRED
`HPA_get_rna_expression_by_source`	`gene_name`, `source_type`, `source_name`	ALL 3 required
`PubMed_search_articles`	`query`, `limit`	Returns plain list, NOT {articles:[]}
`UniProt_get_function_by_accession`	`accession`	Returns list of strings
`alphafold_get_prediction`	`qualifier`	NOT uniprot_accession
`drugbank_get_safety_*`	`query`, `case_sensitive`, `exact_match`, `limit`	ALL required
`STRING_get_protein_interactions`	`protein_ids`, `species`	protein_ids is array; species=9606
`Reactome_map_uniprot_to_pathways`	`id`	NOT uniprot_id
`ChEMBL_get_target_activities`	`target_chembl_id__exact`	Note double underscore
`search_clinical_trials`	`query_term`	REQUIRED parameter
`gnomad_get_gene_constraints`	`gene_symbol`	NOT gene_id
`DepMap_get_gene_dependencies`	`gene_symbol`	NOT gene_id
`BindingDB_get_ligands_by_uniprot`	`uniprot`, `affinity_cutoff`	affinity in nM
`Pharos_get_target`	`gene` or `uniprot`	Both optional but need one

Example Execution: EGFR for NSCLC

Phase 0 Result

Symbol: EGFR, Ensembl: ENSG00000146648, UniProt: P00533, ChEMBL: CHEMBL203

Expected Scores (EGFR for NSCLC)

Disease Association: ~28/30 (strong genetic + pathway + literature)
Druggability: ~24/25 (kinase, many structures, abundant compounds)
Safety: ~14/20 (widely expressed but manageable toxicity)
Clinical Precedent: 15/15 (multiple approved drugs)
Validation Evidence: ~9/10 (extensive functional data)
Total: ~90/100 = Tier 1

Example for Novel Target (e.g., understudied kinase)

Disease Association: ~8/30 (limited GWAS, few publications)
Druggability: ~15/25 (kinase family bonus, AlphaFold structure)
Safety: ~12/20 (limited data, unknown KO phenotype)
Clinical Precedent: 0/15 (no clinical development)
Validation Evidence: ~2/10 (minimal functional data)
Total: ~37/100 = Tier 4

← v1.0.0 All versions