version: "1.0.1" name: boilerplate description: Generate project scaffolds from descriptions. Use when starting a new project, scaffolding, or creating "CLI in Go", "React app with auth", or similar from a short description.

Boilerplate

Generate minimal project scaffolds from short descriptions. Turn "CLI in Go with cobra" or "React app with auth" into a runnable structure with the right files and commands.

When to Use

• User wants to start a new project from a description
• User asks for a scaffold, boilerplate, or starter
• User says "create a X that does Y" and expects a project layout

Workflow

1. Parse request: Language, framework, key features (auth, DB, API, CLI)
2. Choose stack: Specific tools (e.g. cobra for Go CLI, Vite+React for frontend)
3. Design layout: Directories, main entry, config, README
4. Generate: Minimal files to run (main, config, one example)
5. Ask for clarifications, personalisation if needed

Scaffold Rules

1. Minimal: Only what's needed to run and one clear path (e.g. one command, one route).
2. Conventional: Standard layout (e.g. cmd/ for Go, src/ for TS/JS).
3. Runnable: User can install deps and run with 1–2 commands.
4. Documented: README with install, run, and (if applicable) env vars.

README for Scaffolds

# [Project Name]
 
[One-line description]
 
## Setup
 
\`\`\`bash
[install deps: npm install, go mod download, etc.]
\`\`\`
 
## Run
 
\`\`\`bash
[npm run dev, go run ., etc.]
\`\`\`
 
## [Optional: Env / Config]

What to Generate

• Always: Entry point, dependency file (package.json, go.mod, Cargo.toml, etc.), README
• When relevant: Config (e.g. .env.example), one test, .gitignore
• Avoid: Full app logic; keep to minimal “hello world” or one feature

Ambiguity

If the request is vague:

• Pick one reasonable stack and say what you chose: "Using Vite + React; say if you want Next.js instead."
• Default to TypeScript for Node/React unless they say "JavaScript".

Anti-Patterns

• ❌ Huge template with many options; keep it small
• ❌ Unrunnable (missing deps, wrong paths)
• ❌ No README or run instructions
• ❌ Over-engineered (e.g. full DDD for a tiny CLI)