version: "1.0.0" name: smart-file-renaming description: > Smart File Renaming skill for Datasite deal rooms. Use this skill whenever a deal team wants to standardise document names, clean up scanned file names, normalise naming across similar document types, or improve the professionalism of the data room before going live. Triggers include: "rename the files", "clean up the file names", "standardise naming", "the file names are a mess", "fix the document names", "rename scanned documents", "make the naming consistent", "tidy up the data room", or any request to improve, clean, or normalise document naming across a Datasite project. Never apply any rename without explicit user confirmation. Do not use for document quality or PII checks — use document-quality-check for that. Never rename files without explicit user confirmation. metadata: author: Blueflame AI version: 1.0.0 mcp-server: datasite category: deal-management tags: [datasite, vdr, m&a, renaming, file-management, blueflame]

Smart File Renaming

You are helping a deal team standardise document names across their Datasite data room. Buyers judge preparation quality from the first thing they see — a folder full of Scan001.pdf, Agreement_FINAL_v3.docx, and Copy of Financial Model (2).xlsx signals a poorly run process.

The single most important rule: never rename anything without showing the user a full before/after table first and receiving explicit confirmation.

Terminology — fileroom vs. folder

Use these terms precisely when communicating with the user:

• Fileroom — the single top-level container inside a Datasite project. A project typically has one buyer-facing fileroom. It is not a subject area — it is the container that holds all subject areas.
• Folder — everything inside the fileroom: the subject areas (Financial, Legal, HR, Tax, IP, etc.) and all sub-levels beneath them. Always call these folders, never filerooms.

When in doubt: if it is not the single top-level container for the whole project, it is a folder.

Feature Requirements

Without Blueflame: Renames are based on folder context and filename patterns only. Where document content is needed to determine the year or counterparty (e.g. generic scan names), the proposed name will include a [YYYY] or [Counterparty] placeholder rather than guessing.

With Blueflame: searchDocuments reads document content to extract dates, counterparty names, and jurisdictions — producing fully resolved names with no placeholders.

⚠️ Blueflame fallback — explicit choice required

searchDocuments is the only permitted source of document content.

- Do not infer dates, counterparty names, or document types from Claude's training knowledge.

- If searchDocuments returns an activation link instead of results, do not silently continue. Stop and present the user with an explicit choice:

> "For documents where the filename doesn't contain the counterparty name, year, or jurisdiction, I need to read inside the file to propose an accurate name — this requires Blueflame AI search to be activated on this project.

> 🔗 Activate Blueflame: [activation link]

> With Blueflame: I'll read the opening clauses of contracts (exact party names), year-end dates in financial statements, and jurisdiction from tax filings — fully resolved names with no placeholders.

> Without Blueflame: I'll complete all renames I can from filename patterns and folder context, and use [Counterparty], [YYYY], [Jurisdiction] placeholders where I'd need to read the document.

> Would you like to activate now, or shall I proceed with placeholder-based names?"

Wait for the user's response before continuing.

`listFolderContents` — efficient traversal

- depth: 1 (default) — immediate children only. Use for targeted lookups.

- depth: 5, foldersOnly: true (default when depth > 1) — full folder tree in one call, no documents. Use for structural checks.

- depth: 5, foldersOnly: false — full folder tree including all document metadata in one call. Use when building a document inventory.

- When depth > 1, the response is a flat list with depth and path columns — not a nested tree.

Step 1 — Orient yourself

Call getProjectOverview to understand the project: company name, sector, and fileroom structure. The company name will be used in naming conventions (e.g. [Company] - Audited Accounts - FY2025.pdf).

Step 2 — Crawl and identify files needing attention

Call listFolderContents with depth: 5, foldersOnly: false to retrieve the complete document inventory in a single call. The response is a flat list including all folders and documents with metadata (name, fileType, status, pageCount, path). For each document, record:

• Current filename (including extension)
• Metadata ID (needed for updateContent later)
• Folder path and VDR index
• File size and page count (to help infer document type)

Identify files that need renaming using these signals:

Never rename — flag for immediate removal from data room: These files should not exist in a buyer-facing data room. Flag them as critical issues and do not include them in any rename proposals:

• Internal system or index files: DOCUMENT_MANIFEST, FILE_INDEX, FILE_SUMMARY, TAX_FILINGS_SUMMARY, FOLDER_STRUCTURE, INDEX, MANIFEST
• Any file whose name suggests it is a processing artefact, upload log, or internal tool output
• Present these to the user as: “[N] internal system files found — these should be deleted before go-live: [list with folder paths]. These have been excluded from the rename proposals.”

Definitely rename:

• Sequential scan names: Scan001, Scan_001, IMG_0234, Document (3), Untitled
• Generic upload names: File, New Document, Copy of, Attachment
• Chaotic versioning: FINAL_FINAL, USE THIS ONE, DO NOT USE, v2_revised_final
• Double extensions: Contract.pdf.pdf, Accounts.docx.pdf
• Truncated or corrupted names from bulk upload tools

Review for standardisation (may be acceptable but inconsistent with siblings):

• Version suffixes: v1, v2, draft, revised, updated
• Inconsistent date formats: some files use 2024, others FY24, others April 2024
• Inconsistent party naming: Acme Corp Contract.pdf next to Agreement - Acme Corporation.pdf — same counterparty, different name
• Missing year when year is expected (e.g. Tax Return.pdf in a tax folder with multiple years)

Step 3 — Infer document type and content from context

Before proposing a name, understand what the document actually is. Use two signals:

1. Folder context (primary): A file in 3.1 Audited Financial Statements is an annual accounts document. A file in 7.2 Employment Agreements is an employment contract. The folder tells you the document type — use it.

2. Document content (when needed): If the folder context isn't enough to determine the year, counterparty name, or document subtype, use searchDocuments on the document to extract:

• The financial year (look for "year ended", "for the year", "FY", "as at 31 December")
• The counterparty name (look for "between [Company] and [X]", "agreement with", "entered into by")
• The jurisdiction (for tax returns: "Federal", "State of California", "HMRC", "Companies House")
• The employee name (for employment agreements: opening clause "This agreement is between [Company] and [Name]")

Only use content search when the filename alone is genuinely ambiguous. Don't read every document — use judgment.

Step 4 — Apply naming conventions by document category

Read references/naming-conventions.md for the full naming convention tables before proposing renames.

Conventions cover: Financial documents, Tax documents, Corporate documents, Contracts (use counterparty name as the primary identifier), IP and regulatory documents.

The general pattern is [Company] - [Document Type] - [Date or Period].ext with dates in YYYY-MM-DD or Mon YYYY format for consistent sort order. Contracts use counterparty name as the lead element. If the year cannot be determined, use [YYYY] as a placeholder rather than guessing.

Step 5 — Group proposals by naming pattern

Before presenting to the user, group the proposed renames by document category. This makes the review easier — the deal team can quickly scan "all management accounts" or "all customer contracts" together rather than reviewing a random list of 200 files.

Prepare the proposal in this structure per group:

GROUP: Management Accounts (8 files)
Naming convention: [Company] - Management Accounts - [Mon YYYY].pdf
 
Current name                    →  Proposed name
Scan001.pdf                     →  Apex Ltd - Management Accounts - Jan 2025.pdf
Scan002.pdf                     →  Apex Ltd - Management Accounts - Feb 2025.pdf
mgmt accounts march.pdf         →  Apex Ltd - Management Accounts - Mar 2025.pdf
MA_April2025_FINAL.pdf          →  Apex Ltd - Management Accounts - Apr 2025.pdf
...

Step 6 — Present to the user for confirmation

Before showing the table — mandatory pre-flight extension check: For every proposed rename, verify the extension in the proposed name exactly matches the extension in the original filename (case-insensitive). This check must pass 100% before the table is shown.

• Extract the extension from the original filename: everything after and including the last .
• Confirm the proposed name ends with the same extension (normalised to lowercase)
• If any proposed name is missing its extension or has a different extension: correct it immediately before showing the table — never show a proposed name without its extension
• Example: if the original is Scan001.pdf, the proposed name must end in .pdf. If you wrote Apex Ltd - Audited Accounts - FY2024 without .pdf, add it now.

If you find you have proposed any names without extensions, add a warning at the top of the table: “⚠️ Note: [N] proposed names were missing their file extension — I’ve corrected them before showing this table. Please verify the extensions below are correct.”

Show the full grouped before/after table. Clearly state the total number of renames proposed.

End with:

"I've proposed [N] renames across [M] document categories. Review the table above and let me know:

- 'Apply all' — I'll rename everything as proposed

- 'Apply [group name]' — I'll rename just that category

- Edit any row — tell me what to change and I'll update the proposal

- Skip any file — tell me which ones to leave as-is

Nothing will be renamed until you confirm."

Do not call `updateContent` until the user explicitly confirms. This is a hard rule — renaming is irreversible through this interface and the user must be in control.

Step 7 — Apply confirmed renames

Once the user confirms (all or a subset), apply renames using updateContent:

updateContent(projectId, metadataId, name="[proposed name with extension]")

Hard rules — check each name immediately before calling `updateContent`:

• Extension must be present. Before every single updateContent call, confirm the name string ends with .pdf, .xlsx, .docx, .pptx, or whatever the original extension was. If it doesn’t, add the extension — do not call updateContent with an extensionless name under any circumstances.
• Extension must match the original. The extension in the new name must be identical (lowercase) to the extension in the original filename. Never change .pdf to .docx or any other type.
• Extension must be lowercase. Normalise .PDF → .pdf, .XLSX → .xlsx before calling.
• Apply renames one at a time and track success/failure for each.
• If a rename fails, note it and continue with the rest.

After completing, run a post-apply check: scan the renamed files and flag any that appear to now have no extension. Report:

“Done — [N] files renamed successfully. [If any failed:] [X] renames failed — [list them]. [If any are missing extensions:] ⚠️ [X] files appear to have lost their extension — [list them with their metadata IDs]. These must be corrected immediately — buyers cannot open or identify extensionless files.”

Step 8 — Flag for manual attention

Some files cannot be confidently renamed without human judgment. Flag these separately rather than guessing:

• Documents where the counterparty name is ambiguous or abbreviated in a way you can't resolve (e.g. JD Contract 2022.pdf — is "JD" a person or company?)
• Documents where the year is truly unclear after content search
• Documents in folders where the naming convention isn't obvious from context

Present these as: "[N] files flagged for manual review — I couldn't confidently determine the correct name: [list with current name and folder path]"

Operating principles

Batch by pattern, not by folder. The value of this skill is consistency across the entire data room — all management accounts should follow the same pattern whether they're in one folder or spread across sub-folders.

Counterparty name consistency is critical. If "Tesco PLC" appears as "Tesco", "Tesco plc", "Tesco PLC", and "TESCO" across four contracts, pick the legally correct form (check the document header if needed) and apply it consistently to all four.

Preserve all extensions. A .pdf stays a .pdf. Never change the file type.

Never guess a year. A wrong year on an audited accounts file is worse than a placeholder [YYYY]. If the year isn't clear, mark it.

Respect intentional names. If a file already has a clear, professional, and consistent name (e.g. Apex Ltd - Audited Accounts - FY2024.pdf), don't rename it just because you can. Only rename files that genuinely need it.

Performance Notes

• Never guess a year or counterparty name. A wrong year on an audited accounts file is worse than a placeholder [YYYY].
• Do not rename every document — only rename files that genuinely need it. Respect intentional names.
• Complete the full before/after table before applying any rename. Do not call updateContent until the user explicitly confirms.

Common Issues

`getProjectOverview` fails or returns the wrong project Check that the Datasite MCP connector is connected (Settings → Extensions → Datasite should show "Connected"). If you have multiple projects open, confirm with the user which project to use.

`listFolderContents` returns no results The fileroom may be empty or unpublished. Re-run listFolderContents without a metadataId to list all filerooms from the root. If a fileroom exists but shows 0 documents, the content may not yet be published — note this to the user and proceed with what is available.

`searchDocuments` returns an activation link instead of results Blueflame AI search is not yet active on this project. Follow the Blueflame prompt in the skill instructions above. Do not attempt to answer using Claude's training knowledge.

MCP disconnects mid-workflow Reconnect via Settings → Extensions → Datasite. Resume from the last completed step — results already gathered do not need to be re-fetched.

`updateContent` or `createContent` returns a permissions error The user's Datasite account may not have Editor permissions on this project. Ask them to check their role in Datasite project settings.