version: "1.0.2" argument-hint: '[paths] [--simplify] [--review] [--with-profile <name>] [--skip-profile <name>]' disable-model-invocation: true name: code-polish user-invocable: true description: 'Polish recently changed code: simplify for readability/maintainability, then run a risk-profiled review that autonomously applies fixes.'

Code Polish

Objective

Polish recently changed code in one run: simplify for readability and maintainability, then run an exhaustive risk-profiled review that applies fixes autonomously. Resolve scope once, prioritize correctness/security/data-integrity over style, and produce one user-facing report. Run either pass alone with --simplify or --review.

Modes

Passes are selected by flags and default to running both, in this fixed order:

• --simplify only: run the Simplify Pass, then verify and report.
• --review only: run the Review Pass (always applies fixes), then verify and report.
• neither flag, or both flags: run the Simplify Pass, then the Review Pass, over one resolved scope.

When both run, the review pass sees the simplified code: reuse file contents already loaded during simplify and only re-read files the simplify pass changed.

Arguments

• Paths, patterns, a commit/range, or a scope phrase: used in Scope Resolution step 2.
• --simplify: Run the simplify pass only.
• --review: Run the review pass only. The review pass always applies fixes autonomously; there is no report-and-wait mode.
• --with-profile <name>: Force an optional review profile by stem or filename (e.g. --with-profile shell). Repeatable. Review pass only.
• --skip-profile <name>: Skip an optional review profile by stem or filename (e.g. --skip-profile naming). Repeatable. If both --with-profile and --skip-profile name the same profile, skip wins. Review pass only.
• Extra cleanup instructions (e.g. "split _lib.ts into smaller files"): executed during the simplify pass.
• Default: run both passes — simplify, then review-with-autofix — over the resolved scope.

Scope Resolution

Resolve scope once, then treat the result as fixed for the rest of the run.

1. Verify repository context: git rev-parse --git-dir. If this fails, stop and tell the user to run from a git repository.
2. If the request names targets — file paths/patterns, a commit/range, a natural-language subset (e.g. "the parser changes"), or a resolved-scope fenced block with one repo-relative path per line — scope is exactly those targets. Map natural-language subsets to concrete paths before continuing.
3. Otherwise, scope is only session-modified files: files created or edited earlier in this session. Do not include other uncommitted changes.
4. If there are no session-modified files, or earlier conversation history is not visible in this context, fall back to all uncommitted files. Get tracked and untracked paths in a single command, then combine and de-duplicate:

• git --no-pager diff --name-only --diff-filter=ACMR; git --no-pager ls-files --others --exclude-standard

1. Exclude generated, vendored, bulk, and low-signal files from manual simplify/review unless explicitly requested: lockfiles, minified bundles, build outputs, generated outputs, vendored code, and large data snapshots. When excluded files are relevant to correctness, emit an optional fenced code block tagged excluded-scope, one repo-relative path or glob per line, and cover them through verification or invariant checks.
2. If scope resolves to zero files, report that and stop.
3. Emit the scope as a fenced code block tagged resolved-scope, one repo-relative path per line. The block is authoritative: do not re-run scope commands or revisit exclusions afterward.

Workflow

1) Resolve Scope

• Apply the Scope Resolution section and emit the resolved-scope block.
• Emit excluded-scope only when generated, vendored, bulk, or low-signal files are intentionally excluded but still relevant to verification.
• Determine the active passes from the flags (default: both).

2) Simplify Pass

Skip unless the simplify pass is active. Otherwise apply the Simplify Pass section to the resolved scope, plus any extra cleanup instructions.

3) Review Pass

Skip unless the review pass is active. Otherwise apply the Review Pass section to the resolved scope (and any excluded-scope via verification). Build findings internally and apply fixes autonomously in severity order — no separate pre-fix report.

4) Verify

Run the Verification section once, after the active passes, over the final touched scope.

5) Report

Produce the Report section. Include only the subsections for passes that ran.

Simplify Pass

Apply high-confidence simplifications that materially improve comprehension or reduce defect risk while preserving behavior, public contracts, and side effects. Default to no edit unless the change is high-confidence; skip no-op passes and report that the code is already clear rather than churning it.

Operating Rules

• State assumptions before editing. If multiple interpretations would change the simplification or verification strategy, present them and stop for direction.
• Preserve runtime behavior exactly: inputs, outputs, side effects, and error behavior stay stable. Identify invariants first — function signatures and exported APIs, state transitions and side effects, persistence/network behavior, and user-facing messages or error semantics that are externally relied on.
• Prefer project conventions over personal preferences. Infer them from existing code, linters, formatters, and tests.
• Make small, reversible edits. Every changed line should trace to the user's request, requested cleanup, or cleanup caused by your own edits.
• Write the minimum code that solves the requested problem. Do not add features, single-use abstractions, speculative flexibility, or configurability the user did not request.
• Clean up only your own mess: remove imports, variables, functions, and files made unused by your changes; mention pre-existing dead code in Residual Risks instead of deleting it.
• Run naming-only refactors only when they create a concrete clarity or safety gain and can be safely verified. Never reshape APIs solely for taste.
• For generated, vendored, bulk, or low-signal files, simplify the generator, schema, or contract when possible and validate outputs with invariant checks instead of hand-editing every generated row or file.
• Call out uncertainty immediately when behavior may change.

Apply Simplification Passes

Apply the full checklist in this order:

1. Control flow:

• Flatten deep nesting with guard clauses and early returns.
• Replace nested ternaries with clearer conditionals.

1. Naming and intent:

• Rename ambiguous identifiers when local context supports safe renaming.
• Separate mixed concerns into small helpers with intent-revealing names.

1. Duplication:

• Remove obvious duplication.
• Abstract only when at least two real call sites benefit and the abstraction reduces cognitive load.

1. Data shaping:

• Break dense transform chains into named intermediate steps when readability improves.
• Keep hot-path performance characteristics stable unless improvement is explicit and measured.

1. Type and contract clarity:

• Add or tighten type annotations when they improve readability and safety without forcing broad churn.
• Preserve external interfaces unless asked to change them.

Safety Constraints

• Do not convert sync APIs to async (or reverse) unless explicitly requested.
• Do not alter error propagation strategy unless behavior remains equivalent and verified.
• Do not remove logging, telemetry, guards, or retries that encode operational intent.
• Do not collapse domain-specific steps into generic helpers that hide intent.

Simplification Heuristics

• Prefer explicit local variables over nested inline expressions when it reduces cognitive load.
• Prefer one clear branch per condition over compact but ambiguous condition trees.
• Keep function length manageable, but do not split purely for line count.
• Keep comments that explain intent, invariants, or non-obvious constraints; remove comments that restate obvious code behavior.
• Optimize for the next maintainer's comprehension time, not minimum character count.

Anti-Patterns

• Do not perform speculative architecture rewrites or introduce framework-wide patterns while simplifying a small local change.
• Do not replace understandable duplication with opaque utility layers.
• Do not bundle unrelated cleanups into one patch.
• Do not add error handling for impossible scenarios.
• Do not preserve code volume for its own sake; if a simpler equivalent approach exists, use it or explain why it does not satisfy the request.

Review Pass

Find high-impact defects in changed code with evidence, then apply fixes autonomously. Prioritize correctness, security, data integrity, shell/config safety, and regressions over style nits. There is no dry-run: build findings internally, apply fixes in severity order (CRITICAL → HIGH → MEDIUM → LOW), and exercise judgment — smallest defensible fix, skip or down-rank low-value churn, and when behavior intent is ambiguous record a residual risk instead of guessing.

Review Lens

Treat the user's request as the boundary for judging the diff.

• Surface hidden assumptions: if behavior intent is ambiguous or multiple interpretations would lead to different fixes, stop or record the assumption as residual risk instead of guessing.
• Prefer the smallest defensible fix. Flag single-use abstractions, speculative configurability, extra features, and broad rewrites when they increase risk or review burden.
• Treat unrelated churn as suspicious: adjacent refactors, formatting-only edits, deleted pre-existing dead code, or style conversions need direct traceability to the request.
• Verify goal fit: changed behavior should have concrete success criteria and a narrow check. Bugs need reproducing tests when practical; validation changes need invalid-input coverage; refactors need before/after safety checks.

Core Review Checks

Apply on every review.

• CORE-001 Behavior regression (HIGH): changed branch/state transition alters external behavior.
• CORE-002 Error-path safety (HIGH): failures can cascade, crash, or return unsafe defaults.
• CORE-003 Boundary handling (HIGH): null/empty/overflow/edge inputs are not handled.
• CORE-004 Resource hygiene (MEDIUM): leaked timers/listeners/handles/connections.
• CORE-005 Complexity hotspot (MEDIUM): change introduces avoidable coupling or hidden side effects.
• CORE-006 Test gap (MEDIUM): changed behavior has no targeted test coverage.
• CORE-007 Over-scoped change (MEDIUM): changed lines do not trace directly to the user's request or verified cleanup caused by the change.
• CORE-008 Speculative complexity (MEDIUM): new abstraction, configurability, flexibility, or impossible-case handling adds code without proven need.
• CORE-009 Weak success criteria (MEDIUM): implementation lacks a clear verification target for the behavior it claims to change.

Profile Dispatch

Profile dispatch is risk-triggered and exhaustive: select every profile whose risk surface the diff touches, not by file extension alone when core checks already cover the change.

Honor --skip-profile exclusions first, then add --with-profile profiles. Read all selected profiles as parallel `Read` calls in a single message — one batch, each file once, never paged or re-read. Profiles live at references/profiles/<name>.md relative to this file.

Generated and Bulk Files

• Exclude generated, vendored, bulk, and low-signal files from manual review unless the user explicitly asks to inspect them.
• Prefer reviewing the source that creates or constrains them: generator code, schemas, migrations, templates, lockfile update intent, fixture contracts, or serialization/deserialization paths.
• Validate affected outputs with invariant checks: regeneration diffs, schema validation, parser round trips, row counts, checksums, targeted fixture tests, or package-manager lockfile checks.
• Mention excluded files in Scope or Verification when they affect confidence.

Severity Model

• CRITICAL: exploitable security flaw, data loss path, or outage risk on critical paths.
• HIGH: logic defect or performance failure that can break core behavior.
• MEDIUM: maintainability/reliability issue likely to cause near-term defects.
• LOW: localized clarity/style/documentation improvements.

Evidence Rules

• Tie every finding to concrete code evidence at real, verified locations; never fabricate file paths or line numbers.
• Show the input or state that triggers the failure and the changed lines or missing guards that cause it.
• State blast radius and failure mode succinctly. Merge duplicate findings.
• Prefer targeted fixes over broad rewrites.
• For scope or simplicity findings, cite the changed line and the requested behavior it does not serve.
• Mention unrelated dead code as residual risk; do not delete it unless the user asked for cleanup.
• Keep style-only issues at LOW unless they create operational risk.

Verification

Run the narrowest checks that validate touched behavior:

• formatter/lint on touched files
• targeted tests for touched modules
• typecheck when relevant
• invariant checks for any relevant excluded-scope outputs

Issue independent checks as parallel tool calls in a single message, preferring the project's task runner and the narrowest per-file/per-workspace scope over repo-wide commands. When scanning beyond the diff (call sites, usages), prefer fast tools (rg/fd/ast-grep) when available and batch independent searches and reads. Run broader checks only when risk warrants it, especially when changes touch shared contracts. Name every skipped check and why.

Report

Use these section headings, in this order. Include only subsections for passes that ran. Omit sections that do not apply — do not number them and do not leave gaps or placeholders.

Scope

Files and functions touched, final state, and any excluded-scope entries with the validation strategy used for them.

Simplifications

Only if the simplify pass ran. One sentence per meaningful change, focused on the readability or maintainability gain. Confirm behavior-preservation assumptions explicitly.

Review Findings and Fixes

Only if the review pass ran. Findings and applied fixes ordered CRITICAL → HIGH → MEDIUM → LOW. For each: [SEVERITY] Title — path/to/file.ext:line, concrete impact, evidence, the fix applied, and confidence (high | medium | low).

Verification

Commands run and outcomes, including skipped checks.

Residual Risks

One line per risk: Assumed <assumption>; if wrong, <what breaks>; check via <command or inspection>. Plain language — expand or gloss domain-specific terms. Include questions that need a user decision, phrased directly. Write None. when there are none.

Stop Conditions

Stop and ask for direction when:

• a required review profile file (references/profiles/*.md) is missing.
• simplification or a fix requires changing public API/contracts or implies a larger redesign rather than a local change.
• behavior parity cannot be confidently verified, or the code appears intentionally complex due to domain constraints.
• behavior intent is too ambiguous to classify severity, or multiple plausible interpretations would produce materially different edits, findings, or fixes.
• required validation tooling is unavailable and risk is high.